Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Share

Maybe I am getting cranky as I go into my third week of book tour. I was on Fox News yesterday morning and said (as I had indicated beforehand that I would) that the whole Benghazi story has been hyped. The anchor pushed back, so I defended my position. My view -- that Fox is openly supportive of the Republican Party, and that the Benghazi incident was hyped in part because it occurred near the end of the presidential campaign -- induced heart flutters in some quarters.

I was surprised that they cut me off instead of doing the manly thing and riding to the sound of the guns. Whattabunchawimps. It reminded me of something that Col. Nathan R. Jessup once said. Or, as a defense reporter commented to me yesterday, "The story is not about Benghazi, it's about how Fox can't tolerate criticism."

Some guy apparently claiming to be a spokesman for Fox misinformed the Hollywood Reporter that I apologized afterwards. Unfortunately the Hollywood Reporter didn't ask for specifics, or even ask me about it -- and I am not hard to find. (Dude, that's an automatic F in Journalism 101.)

Finally: Okay, no network is responsible for the hateful comments made by its viewers. But for what it is worth, here is a sampling of e-mails I got from supporters of Fox. I was surprised at how few wished to engage on the facts and instead just spewed nasty thoughts.

This was from Donna: "What a sleazel Tom Ricks is spreading is Obamaganda! Guess he thinks his opinions, etc. are so superior to half the country that he will say and do anything."

From Thomas: "You just showed what a liberal ass looks like with his pants down. What an idiot!"

Jim wrote, "I saw your Fox News interview on the HuffPost portion on my AOL page. I thought your 'performance' was really arrogant. Smug assholes like you is why I don't watch the news anymore. You guys have divided up into either Obama bashers or Obama ass kissers. As for what happened in Bhengazi [sic] it is obvious the Fox News reporter you smartassed to does not know what happened there. You know what though? You don't know what happened either. I think it deserves a little scrutiny instead of a 'happens all the time' attitude that you offered in your bullshit appearance on Fox."

From LH: "Shove off commie."

Wikimedia

 

GALE

12:59 PM ET

November 27, 2012

Well done

The usual route...saying the same thing about FOX News on MSNBC... would not have helped book sales nearly as much. Well done.

 

TOM RICKS

6:41 PM ET

November 27, 2012

Nah

I told someone at MSNBC today who asked me to appear that if I went on their network, I'd say that they do the same thing as Fox, but not as well.
Best,
Tom

 

JR HOPE VS FEAR

5:22 AM ET

November 28, 2012

Well Done

THANKS TOM for speaking the truth! How absolutely refreshing!

 

SCREWED AND TATTOOED

1:05 PM ET

November 28, 2012

Hype?

Not sure I follow the "hype" accusation. It appears to me they are actually doing their job as journalists. I.e. trying to get to the bottom of an obviously screwed up situation. Made only more important by the loss of 4 American lives including an Ambassador. Cover up or not (yes I lean towards the former) the mainstream has been woefully absent in trying to find out the truth. Very much unlike Watergate where no one was even hurt. If you don't see the relevance/importance, I'd argue you have an agenda yourself.

 

WHISKEYTANGOFOXTROT52

4:25 PM ET

November 27, 2012

Oh yessss!

You da man, Tom.

Fox is not the mouthpiece of the Republican party, as is so often said ... the influence runs exactly opposite to that. Fox is DRIVING the Repub agenda. FauxBengaziGate is the perfect example.

OohRahh and don't go wobbly.

 

ROBING

6:40 PM ET

November 27, 2012

right on

I imagine they're just a little thin-skinned and tetchy at the mo' , given how they took it in the `nads on election night.

 

JOANNE LOUGHRY

7:34 PM ET

November 28, 2012

Big time greatness

Indeed, a consequential performance, a moment of magnitude, and lots of kudos to Mr. Ricks--well worth it.
It's significant.
Glad I saw it and glad it lives on.

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More