Fred Kaplan, who writes for Slate, asked me the other day to name a favorite book from each war I write about in my new book, which came out this week. So I wrote it up, and sent it to Fresh Air, Terry Gross's great interview show on NPR. You can listen to her interview of me, which ran yesterday, here. (Meanwhile, here is a review of my book by one of the best younger military historians in the country, Brian Linn. And here is a piece in Huffington Post by the intrepid Andrea Stone.)

But you can read my booklist just by keeping on reading:

World War II

This is almost impossible. Where to start? There are so many good histories, so many powerful memoirs, starting with Winston Churchill's and Field Marshal Slim's. Also, Rick Atkinson's trilogy on the Army's War in Europe-the last volume will come out next year-is a must read. But when I think of my single favorite, I think it has to be Eugene Sledge's With the Old Breed in Peleliu and Okinawa.

Korea

I'm tempted to pick Martin Russ' The Last Parallel, a memoir of being a Marine near the end of the war. But the centerpiece of the war really for me is the Chosin Reservoir campaign. For that, I think I'd have to pick Roy Appleman's East of Chosin, a painful history of the forgotten fight of an Army regiment that was wiped out on the east side of the reservoir.

The Vietnam War

An odd war-thousands of volumes written, but no one great book. Right now I am in the middle of Karl Marlantes' novel Matterhorn, which is terrific. But I won't know if it is my favorite until I finish it. Until then, I think I will have to chose James MacDonough's Platoon Leader. A close second is H.R. McMaster's Dereliction of Duty, a tough read but an important one.

The 1991 Gulf War

For this one, I think I'd have to go with The Generals' War, by Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor. It covered the war but also provided some prescient doubts about the quality of U.S. military leadership.

The war in Iraq

Putting aside my own works on this war (Fiasco and The Gamble), I think my favorite so far is The Long Walk, a memoir by a bomb disposal technical, Brian Castner.

The war in Afghanistan

The overall book hasn't been written yet. But I think the ones that capture the feel of how this war was conducted are the memoirs about how Osama bin Laden escaped at Tora Bora. The place to begin is probably Gary Bernsten's Jawbreaker.  

 

JPWREL

1:52 PM ET

November 2, 2012

Question

Just curious if anyone here believes as I do that it is a bit premature for histories on the last decades wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

 

TOM RICKS

4:34 PM ET

November 2, 2012

Never too early

History is a moving target. You can start with memoirs, documents, and such. Every book of history can help subsequent works.

To use another metaphor, I think of writing history like operating at the coalface in a mine. You keep chipping away in an endless seam.

Best,
Tom

 

KRIEGSAKADEMIE

4:55 PM ET

November 2, 2012

TOO EARLY FOR HISTORY OF AFGHAN WAR?

It is far too early for anything that draws conclusions. Was it worth it? Did “we” win anything? Did “they” win anything? Is Afghanistan a better place for the war? A worse place? A permanently changed place?

Nothing of that sort will be possible for some years to come.

But narrative on significant bits can be valid and interesting. The narrative work fits Tom's "working at the coal"face metaphor. But analytic history really isn't like working at a coal face.

The full story of the cavalry battle at Krojanty (Polish horses v German Tanks) in Sept of 1939 could probably have been written as early as 1942. Perhaps it was.

But to move from battle narrative to war history, will, as you rightly suggest, require considerably more time.

 

JPWREL

7:25 PM ET

November 2, 2012

Great metaphor and you have

Great metaphor and you have made a very convincing point.

 

TOM RICKS

8:43 PM ET

November 2, 2012

One thing my work has taught me

Analysis is easy. Anyone can stand pack and say, Peel me a grape. Stand at the top of the shaft and grade the coal as it is dumped in the tipple.

But gathering facts at the coal face? That's the grunt work of reporting or of history, and that is the more important job, in my mind.

Best,
Tom

 

KRIEGSAKADEMIE

8:57 AM ET

November 3, 2012

Tom: Analysis is easy

The instant kind of analysis that we do when we post our comments on a blog is certainly easy.

The definitive (or near-definitive) analysis of wars and campaigns is hard work, however, and work for which few are fit.

Many of the books recommended (both by Tom and by posters) are analytical and were not "easy".

As to relative importance of reportage vs analysis , Tom probably has a point. The great analytical books about wars could never have been writted without the grist gathered at the coal face.

K

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More