Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Share

The following sentences, printed under the byline of Julie Bosman of the New York Times, could only be written by someone who has not been paying attention:

"Now that American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan is winding down, the warriors are telling their stories. . . The books appear to be part of the next generation of writing from the wars, following a first crop of books by journalists, like "Imperial Life in the Emerald City" by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, about Iraq.

Actually, one of the surprises of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq has been just the opposite: How many fine memoirs have been written over the last 10 years by soldiers, including many by enlisted ones.

As a public service, here is a remedial reading list for Ms. Bosman:

Nathaniel Fick, One Bullet Away

Andrew Exum, This Man's Army

Craig Mullaney, The Unforgiving Minute

Peter Mansoor, Baghdad at Sunrise

Kayla Williams,  Love My Rifle More Than You

Matt Gallagher, Kaboom

Benjamin Tupper, Greetings from Afghanistan

Seth Folsom, The Highway War

David Bellavia, House to House

Joe LeBleu, Long Rifle

Milo Afong, Hogs in the Shadows

Donovan Campbell, Joker One

Nick Popaditch, Once a Marine

John Crawford, The Last True

Jeremiah Workman, Shadow of the Sword

Jason Hartley, Just Another Soldier

Paul Rieckhoff, Chasing Ghosts

Nathan Sassaman, Warrior King

Vivian Gembara, Drowning in the Desert

Rusty Bradley, Lions of Kandahar

Sean Parnell, Outlaw Platoon

Brandon Friedman, The War I Always Wanted

Nate Self, Two Wars

Michael Franzak, A Nightmare's Prayer

I know I am leaving out a bunch more, but all my books are 600 miles from where I am writing this. And I haven't even included memoirs by spies, diplomats and other civilian officials. I suggest that as penance, Ms. Bosman read at least five of these memoirs.

Amazon

 

DILNIR

12:18 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Warrior King

I dunno. I'd have thought that Berms R Us or Drowining In the Desert would be more logical titles for Col Sassaman. Such is life. I don't suppose Col West has written a book as well.

 

PYORTOR

3:27 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Sassaman's book is a subliminal ad

for what is unsavory about West Point. And I have a rule I try to stick by when reading: When an author compares himself to "Braveheart," it's time to stop.

 

OMPHALOS

12:18 PM ET

March 19, 2012

paying attention, but only...

To SEALs. Holy fan-boy! Smoke some more BUD-S, dear. She's only missing a few choice Marcinko quotes and this write-up would be complete. I'm surprised she didn't blurb the Perfect Pushup (TM)

 

TOM KENNEDY

1:56 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Good point

I can't quite put my finger on why, but I'm little uncomfortable with how heavily the SEAL angle is marketed on some of these products. The cover of the Chris Kyle book is especially loud - it might have well been subtitled "Hey, this guy is a Navy SEAL, you know."

I'm not really going anywhere with this, it's just my first thought after reading the NYT piece.

 

JPWREL

3:39 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Warrior??

Some may understandably be weary of ‘SEAL-mania’ but personally I am getting even more tired of the ridiculous term ‘warrior’ to describe American troops even those few who go out and seek battle. The use of such a term by the military is nothing more than a ridiculous boasting self-flattery. What is wrong with the term soldier or Marine or sailor?

 

SILENTSHWAN

5:33 PM ET

March 19, 2012

I'd pick Professional over Warrior any time.

But seeing how there's not a lot of that going around I guess I'll take Soldier Sailor Airman or Marine.

 

PYORTOR

12:49 PM ET

March 20, 2012

The Army's "Warrior" project

is a product of the military's faith in controlling the message, for recruitment, for psyops, for self-referential ego massage, or whatever they had in mind. Problem is that its authors were and are and always will be innocent of discursive theory.

Calling use of the term "self-flattery" is being kind, which is fine.

Some four-star in 2003 (Byrne?) thought it was a great way to make 88M's, 77F's, 71L's and the like into bloody-eyed killers. Instead, all the mental masturbation it encouraged took off like giant circle jerk, and now the force cannot seem to divorce itself from the embarassingly bad habit.

The term is cloying as hell, and you'd think the Army would have burned it up by now, but self-agrandizement is just too damn addictive. Too bad, since it means that all the effort to play "stratcom" rings hollow when you enshrine your self image as a barbarian.

 

LEROY THE MASOCHIST

1:39 PM ET

March 19, 2012

what do you expect

from the New York Times?

 

RVN SF VET

2:26 PM ET

March 19, 2012

SOME EFFING RESEARCH!

Numerous NYT articles have egregious errors and omissions because these lazy dolts can't spell Google. Don't get me wrong, I like the New York Times, but that is why I expect more of them. Today, their military reporter is embarrassingly ignorant. I wonder if any of Drew Middleton's stem cells can be harvested?

For those of you who were available to watch, the Gulf War news conferences were both embarrassing and hysterical for the questions asked.

Perhaps more embarrassing is that no one seems to fact check prior to publication. Some of the columnists may write great stuff, but too often they are replete with factual errors.

So, she worked for Maureen Dowd ,,,,,,

 

F.B. DE ABARCA

5:24 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Boy . . ,

. . . are you right about those news conference questions. Prompting such responses as, "Have you ever been in the middle of a minefield?!" (I don't suppose shaving cream would have been a very effective marker in Iraq. A bit too open and windy.)

It did make one wonder if these people had any inquisitiveness and desire to increase their knowledge base on the topic they were assigned, or were they merely former high school gossips who found an outlet.

 

KEVINSD

1:57 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Then and Now

I don't want to pile on, but there is something disturbing about a NY Times journalist not knowing about this trend of veterans writing memoirs which are nearly contemporaneous to events, because this does suggest ignorance of the seismic changes which have occurred during the past ten or so years.

According to wiki, Bosman graduated from college in 2001 and first started working for the NY Times (as an assistant to Maureen Dowd) in 2002. The war in Afghanistan has lasted longer than her career as a journalist.

And it wouldn't astonish me if she were simply applying the template of previous wars. Eg. "All Quiet on the Western Front" and "Goodbye to All That" came out in 1929, "Memoirs of an Infantry Officer" came out in 1930, etc. The film "Platoon" came out in 1986 etc.

Now veterans write nearly-contemporaneously and the public (I'll argue, though this contradicts Bosman's thesis) doesn't really care. What we're missing -- and what I predict we'll never get -- is some treatment of the Wars on Terror which is embraced by the culture at large (as was, during earlier times, "Red Badge of Courage", "Naked and the Dead", "Best Years of our Lives", etc.).

Though I'm not quite sure why.

 

KUNINO

2:16 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Agreed, Mr Ricks. And the probable fault ...

.. is the tightened budget in virtually all (probably that should be just plain "all", but I'm being prudent) newspapers that have forced them to prune their budgets and cut down on the back-end staff -- the copy editors who get no bylines and supposedly examine each story for commnonsense as well as grammar, spelling, accuracy and the like. We can expect lower standards from all newspapers, and we're getting them from many. Ms Bosman has an easy, clear writing style and her story fit the hole on some NYT page. its appearance was more or less guaranteed. As we see, accuracy and sense were not required and no apology or retraction can be expected.

Like many others, NYT errs in both political directions. A post-Panjwai story was headlined with an observation that the massacre had pointed to war strains. The idea seemed to be that US forces in Afghanistan were suffering such strains; Afghans looking at the charred corpses of their small kids weren't.

 

WILLIEJOE

2:35 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Image not Reality

Bingo Tom! Well done. Seal Team Six is now the prefered "Heroic" image for the american media-this is far more "acceptable" than pictures of the Wanat grunts after fighting for their lives or marines emerging out of the Falujah fight. No exhausted,dirty,wounded americans with the grief of dead or badly wounded brothers carved into their faces( it'll cost us viewer share). Where are the Bill Mauldin and Ernie Pyle of today when americans must understand - this is what happens when you don't pay attention to what your leaders are doing. This is not a critique of the Seals or sour grapes-it is a damnation of the infantile level of the american media mess.

 

OMPHALOS

2:45 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Calling Ernie Pyle...

I nominate Dexter Filkins (_formerly_ of the Gray Lady, now ensconced--happily, I'd imagine--at _The New Yorker_.

 

RVN SF VET

8:40 PM ET

March 19, 2012

C. J. CHIVERS

Chivers comes close, but without the warmth of Ernie Pyle. However, as a former Marine Company Commander, he makes no technical mistakes. Also, he doesn't let experience influence his reporting.

The closest we have to Ernie Pyle's caring is Michael Yon who has been a true embed relating both the EM, NCOs, and a battalion commander. He has given a very human view of patrolling and getting wounded and the weight of battalion command. See http://www.michaelyon-online.com.

Bing West, at 73, humps a rucksack with Marines and Special Forces advisors and gives good insights to the war, but nobody I've read asks a soldier what he is writing or what he feels or what he wants the folks back home to know. But, then again, these are not drafted citizen soldiers.

It is a different war fought by and reported by different people and there are very few Ernie Pyles and Edward R, Murrows today. Although I have not seen him lately, John F. Burns of the NYT comes close to Mr. Murrow.

 

MICHAEL VREDENBURG

6:27 PM ET

March 19, 2012

I'd like to see some good

I'd like to see some good fiction and poetry, and perhaps some wartime literary criticism a la Paul Fussell. From wars past we had Crane, Bierce, Twain, Graves, Sassoon, Owen, Hemingway, Remarque, Maugham, Dos Passos, Jones, Mailer, et al. Even Vietnam gave us Greene, Roth, Delvecchio, Hasford, O'Brien, Maitland, Webb and many others. I found Swofford's "Jarhead" to be hyperbolic and reliant on falsehoods that the average civilian would never catch. In the modern era unfortunately it seems we're stuck with talent-less hacks like Dale Brown and Tom Clancy.

 

HUNTER

9:12 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Night Draws Near

Does that count as a memoir? Prob. not.

No mention of Myers "Eyes on the Horizon"...snort. Or Franks' book? I haven't the energy or will to even Google it. double snort.

 

DOUGFIR1

10:53 PM ET

March 19, 2012

My War, Killing Time in Iraq

by Colby Buzzell. Not a heroic story in the "Seal Team Six" line but my coworker who did two tours in Iraq as an 11B said it sounded about right.

 

WICKBAM

3:36 PM ET

March 21, 2012

I love the part

Where they capture a high ranking Baathist and one soldiers screams it's payback for 9/11 while Buzzell is thinking it was probably as a big a surprise to him as it was to the Americans

 

WILLIEJOE

11:33 AM ET

March 20, 2012

@ Omphalos,RVN SF Vet, DOUGFIR 1

Thank you, taking notes as always and will read carefully.

 

FINNEGANLAURIE

3:28 AM ET

April 16, 2012

For those of you who were

For those of you who were available to watch, the Gulf War news conferences were both embarrassing and hysterical for the questions asked. Perhaps more embarrassing is that no one seems healthdebts to fact check prior to publication. Some of the columnists may write great stuff, but too often they are replete with factual errors.

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More