Thursday, February 23, 2012 - 6:07 AM

Americans are unhappy and in a hunker-down mode, says a strategic assessment by a Canadian defense institute that is being rolled out today:
Americans are war-weary, disappointed with what has been achieved at great expense, and feeling exploited by ungrateful allies. Debate is intensifying over how national interests should be defined and the degree to which the security of Americans requires expenditure of lives and treasure in faraway places. The rising mood of disengagement coupled with a fragile economy will make it very difficult for the administration to send large forces anywhere in 2012 unless security interests are openly threatened or humanitarian need is overwhelming.
. . . that our troops need to be rested and many need to be retrained in their long-unused primary MOSs (such as artillery), combat unit organization requires a hard look and much change, strategic options and imperatives need to be reevaluated, war-weary equipment needs to be reassessed and repaired or replaced, recruiting standards and practices need to be examined and ruthlessly brought back in line with the aspirations of the AVF, and on and on and on.
As a former field artillery surveyor myself, I can say that such technical skills were virtually non-existent during my time in the army, when all of our time was spent practicing patrolling, room-clearing, etc. Field exercises in the states were always sobering experiences to those of us who thought we were outstanding soldiers overseas (where we drove around a lot), only to find ourselves utterly confused when it came to executing an artillery mission.
The really awful part of non-reliance on artillery in Iraq and Afghanistan is that the entire generation of artillerymen that just patrolled over the past ten years now consists of NCOS and SNCOs who don't know enough to impart skills and tricks to junior enlisted, nor do company-grade officers. Firing artillery is very nearly a lost =art= in the U.S. ground services. Take away the generator that runs the computers and it's as good as blowing up the battery; the guns cannot be aimed by humans and there's no one to instruct outside of by-the-book rote drill.
The crusty old salts still knew their craft, but the young E-5s and E-6s sure had a lot of trouble. And as you mentioned, even officers struggled with gunnery. I recall seeing young Captains desperately cramming long-forgotten knowledge on gunnery tables, deflection, etc days before an FTX!
Well yes we are and Eric is absolutely right about the condition and needs of our
armed forces. Unfortunately that isn't going to matter a bit because the american people don't get to decide whether we go to war or not. That decision is made exclusively in DC and then the spin machine goes into high rev and congress salutes and writes checks- you know the usual arguements and propaganda bullet points for the right and left I won't bother repeating them. Obviously they are'nt going to send a large ground army into the ME in the next year- they don't need to( see Libya,Somalia,southern Philipines or Yemen.) There are very lethal US military assets that don't require that - which the contributors to this blog are more familiar than I am. Any one of these assets could be the ignition source for a larger conflict that would require us to "defend the homeland" ! Everybody would fall right into line and as usual our most dedicated citizens would get tossed into the meat grinder to the endearing chants of " you signed a contract".
Yeah we're sick and tired of this but we are'nt ready to take this system down and pay the price for that so the Cabaret of Death will continue to dance on.
The truly scary thing about what is coming relates to what Eric Hammel wrote about long-overdue unit organization reviews. As memories fade, rice bowls will come out of the cabinets where they have been stored for several years. The same narrowly focused, flawed decision making that killed MOS' like electronic warfare and got rid of Guardrail post-1989 will start moving the bodies that remain after the drawdown blood-letting to someone's pet project, opening gaps future bad guys will exploit.
Exploited by ungrateful allies?
I don't think I ever got that sense from hearing our countrymen talk, but then again I was living under a rock until last year when I finally started to take an interest in politics and issues of global security again. When I read about Libya I was more struck by a kind of bitter amusement about countries that had taken the whole idea of the peace dividend a bit too much to heart.
Sorry I had to comment on the picture. We are all still living in igloos up here - lol. Our life quotes are all about how cold it is.
I'm just kidding, but I thought this was a funny picture to choose!
if you are a Jimmy Carter type it means being nice and saying don't do bad things or we will not send you 3 million dollars this year only 2,750,000 if you are a Reagan type it means standing on your own two feet and let people know you mean business.
"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB
Unfortunately that isn't going to matter a bit because the american people don't get to decide whether we go to war or not. That decision is made exclusively in DC and then the spin machine goes into high rev and congress salutes and writes checks- you know the usual arguements and propaganda bullet points for the right and left I won't bother repeating them. Obviously they helpwithbaby are'nt going to send a large ground army into the ME in the next year- they don't need to( see Libya,Somalia,southern Philipines or Yemen.)
(10)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE