By Lt. Col. Thomas Cooper, USAF

Best Defense aviation literature correspondent

Earlier this month the Air Force released the Chief of Staff of the Air Force's (CSAF) Reading List (CSAF). One of the non-flying things I've looked forward to in the past 16 years of my Air Force career is the CSAF's list. Ever since the first one from General Ron Fogleman in 1996, the list has presented books about the Air Force and its history that I've never heard of. Sadly, when I opened up this year's list, there were no books that I hadn't already heard of or enough that reached back into Air Force heritage and history like previous years.

"Every Airman an Innovator" is the theme of this year's list, which captures some of the books, but it doesn't emphasize "being an Airman" as well as I think it could. Although being an innovator is part of Air Force heritage, the lack of organizing principles for the list (previous lists have used strategic context, Air Force heritage, leadership, military history, etc.) makes it difficult to connect back to innovation and Air Force heritage. The list jumps from management theory to satire to science to historical fiction and doesn't focus as well on what is important as an Airman as previous lists have done.

Unfortunately, heritage isn't an Air Force strength as the service often spends too much time justifying itself as a valued contributor to the Joint force. This past year the Air Force has clearly stated its contribution better than I've heard in my career and I think should be included in every Air Force message. These purposes are the Air Force's heritage and would have been a great thing to use to help organize the list. With an enduring role to establish control in air, space and cyberspace, hold any target at risk, provide responsive ISR, and rapidly move people and cargo anywhere in the world, the Air Force has a strong foundation to build a reading list from.

Books on Claire Chennault and the Flying Tigers, B-29 operations in the Pacific, and "flying the hump" would have all been examples of the Air Force's enduring roles that would also help Airmen learn more about the changing strategic context. The three examples also do a good job of showing that no matter the conflict, the Air Force has always strived to control the air, rapidly move people and cargo and strike targets from great distances. Each example is also full innovative thinking by Airmen that is an enduring characteristic of serving in the Air Force.

Although I am disappointed by the books, the true innovation in this year's CSAF list is its inclusion of movies, TED presentations and a wide range of internet resources. As younger Airmen are raised with iPads for text books, these other media will help achieve the purpose of a good reading list and provide a broader set of learning tools. Unfortunately, these resources also do not have much of a clear organization other than their source.

The inclusion of movies will be a very useful tool for commanders and mentors and was the high point of the list for me. Strategic Air Command captures the challenges of the rapidly expanding new Air Force and the contribution of Airmen serving in the early days of the Cold War. With real-life bomber pilot Jimmy Stewart in the lead role this movie shouldn't be missed. I would have linked the movie to 15 Minutes: General Curtis LeMay and the Countdown to Nuclear Annihilation under the caption "want to learn more." I'd also have added Dr Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb because it really is how many people see Strategic Air Command and the recently released The Partnership to fully loop from SAC to the future of nuclear weapons. I would have also added War to accompany Restrepo since I was a bigger fan of the book.

Using the TED presentations is a true innovation that I think will become the most popular element of the "reading list." I had never seen the Norden Bombsight presentation and enjoyed that story. Again it could have been linked better to the books and movies. Both Catch-22 and Memphis Belle being on the list would have tied the story of this innovation better and another example of how organization of the list disappoints and doesn't lead Airmen to broader learning.

And finally, the diverse on-line options included in "RESOURCES" is a useful and innovative way to help expand Airmen's set of learning tools. "Resources includes information on premier educational, think tank, heritage, documentary, humanities, and scientific organizations" and does a great job of improving an Airman's self-study tool box to expand how they think. I will probably bookmark most of these and will wander through them if I find the time. Linked to a book, movie or theme other than innovation, to force exploration would have been a more useful way to organize the resources.

Overall, I'd give the books a "C minus" because they don't go far enough, in an organized manner to build Air Force heritage. The grade is brought up to a "B plus" by the inclusion of all of the other tools for learning that will be useful. As the first use of diverse media on a "reading list" it is a great start. Next year I'm hoping will be an "A" when the entire list reinforces Air Force heritage and links the different tools together so the whole team is gaining the same knowledge, no matter the source.

Lt. Col. Tom Cooper is the Air Force fellow at the Center for a New American Security. He is spending this year reading following a career flying the E-3 Sentry, SAMFOX C-9s in the 89 AW and C-40s as commander of the AF Reserve's active associate 54 AS. He has spent time on the Joint Staff and Air Mobility Command staff. After his fellowship he looks forward to getting back to leading Airmen and helping them pick books.

Air Force

 

RYANP

1:58 PM ET

January 26, 2012

John Boyd

I haven't read many Air Force Books, but I'd like to. I'd be interested in your take on the ones I have read, John Boyd biographies:

Boyd: The Fighter Pilot who Changed the Art of War by Robert Coram, and

The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security

I've added some of the ones you mentioned to my wish list. Thanks

 

TRAX

7:53 AM ET

January 27, 2012

FWIW, I thought Robert

FWIW, I thought Robert Coram's book on Boyd was worth the read. If you liked it, check out his book on Col Bud Day as well- I think it's called "American Patriot."

 

CARL

3:09 PM ET

January 26, 2012

I would like to see Christina

I would like to see Christina Goulter's "A Forgotten Offensive", about the RAF Coastal Command's efforts against German coastal shipping on somebody's list someday.

It is a wonderfully interesting book about something that the RAF really got good at but ultimately wasn't worth doing. One of those just because you can doesn't mean you should kind of things.

 

TRAX

10:01 PM ET

January 26, 2012

Steep Grading Curve

Hmmm. Maybe it's because I like to peruse reading lists for new purchase ideas rather than viewing them as penultimate "best of" lists, but I think a C- for insufficient heritage and organization seems a little harsh.

Unlike the other Services, the Air Force reading list in the past several years has been completely new every year. Like the Air Force itself, this tendency to go for the new over the tried, can be both a blessing and a curse. This means that any particular year might be light on one organizing topic (I thought 2008 and 2009 were light on heritage as well) or the best books might not fit into neat categories. Ultimately, I think it's just a different approach- the CSA, CNO, and CMC lists all accrete books into bins based on rank, while the last two CSAFs have started fresh each year with a list for all Airmen.

Therefore, if an airpower reader (or reading list critic) is looking for more heritage, just flip back to past years' reading lists-- where Lt Col Cooper would have found his suggested book on Chennault (2007) and others to scratch his itch for the Army Air Force's experience in WWII (Daring Young Men, Lemay, Masters of the Air, Courage and Air Warfare, Winged Victory, etc.).

Thanks for the review- it's always nice to see a BD discussion about the Air Force that doesn't involve closing our PME or our reversion to the Army Air Corps.

 

LUVMY91STANG

10:46 PM ET

January 26, 2012

TED

is awesome. It's mandatory if you want to know what is going on in the world.

 

POPSIQQ

8:27 AM ET

January 27, 2012

How Could They Miss It?

Where's Catch 22???

It's about airmen, and bombing and war. It's also about business and the materialist perspective that helps us all 'get ahead'. It's about 'black eyes' and 'cap feathers', and dealing with the guys who don't, or won't 'fit in'. It's a cautionary tale for some, and a handbook for others.

And it's freaking hilarious, which is something the USAF isn't.

 

TRAX

9:20 AM ET

January 27, 2012

They didn't ...

POPSIQQ, the short answer is, they didn't forget it-- it's the third book in the list (http://www.af.mil/information/csafreading/index.asp). But I guess you could fault them for not including _both_ the book and the movie-- and I agree the movie is great.

Since Catch 22 is on the list, does that mean the USAF is back to being "freaking hilarious"?

 

GOOSE GOOSE

9:20 AM ET

January 27, 2012

Are you kidding me?

POPSIQQ,

Did you even go to the freaking site or look at the entire list? If you did, you would notice Catch 22 is on the list. Minimal effort required before stating "How could they miss it?" Short answer, they didn't.

 

GOOSE GOOSE

9:36 AM ET

January 27, 2012

Fair, but where's the discussion on the actual material?

Certainly, debates on books and reading lists are enjoyable exercises: each would change it up a little bit, but two points...
(1): this article lacks any commentary on the actual material, only organizing factors of the material. The author should probably concern himself with what's actually in the books (and other sources) more than how they are linked together, which brings me to my second point (2): it's a little insulting to think that Airmen need titled categories to make important links between the works. Categories are often limiting in exactly the way the Air Force doesn't want to be. If you are looking to make connections, take two seconds, read the executive summaries, and off you go. How hard is it to think...I dig WWII/Heritage, let's take a look, Catch-22, Freedom Flyers, Unbroken, The Memphis Belle, Norden Bombsight (TED). Do you need a lesson plan? I think Airmen will appreciate the flexibility to make unique, important connections on their own. Thank God we don't have all Airmen reading the exact same thing, making the same connections, having the same conversations. It's called reading/watching, introspection, critical thinking, and choice. Thank God we're challenging our Airmen to think across genre with diverse materials.

 

XENOPHON

8:40 PM ET

January 27, 2012

Interesting Selection

What would be more interesting to me, first of all, is a poll on what percentage of airmen read any of the books on the 2011 list.

It is useful to go to the linked CSAF website and compare the 2012 list with the several years previous which are available there.

I agree that Flying Tigers/WW II in China/East Asia is lacking, given the "pivot".

Also, nothing that looks forward to the increasing predominance of UAV/drone warfare. Is there nothing?

A book on Islam and feminism (Paradise Beneath Her Feet)? Really?? Glad to see all the bases are being covered.

Makes sense that there is a book on China (The Party)--surprised that there is only one.

Don't understand the point of a book on President Polk and the Mexican War.

The Gray, Salter, and Hildenbrand books look interesting and relevant. Kaku on the future seems a good idea.

Good selection of films. A little surprised not to see 12 O'clock HIgh or Bridges at Toko Ri, but you can't put everything in one year (if your intent is to have a new list every year.)

A more synthetic look at East Asian history and its principle dynamics might have been a good idea as well. It's as important to know how the Thais feel about the Laotians and the Vietnamese as it has been to understand Sunni-Shia and Arab-Persian issues in the Middle East.

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More