Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Share

I just liked this photograph. President Obama yesterday bestowed the Medal of Honor on Dakota Meyer, the Marine on the right. Just when I think Obama is tone deaf on the military, he does something like this that makes me think he really knows what he is doing. Apparently Meyer had mentioned to White House staffers that he would like to have a beer with the president.

whitehouse.gov

 

KINSHANE

12:01 PM ET

September 16, 2011

As we'd say in Boston

that's pretty pissah.

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

12:04 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Prefer

Wicked pissah

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

12:09 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Meyer

is just an amazing example of personal courage, going back five times through a gauntlet of fire in an exposed turret, the driver was awarded the Cross from what I understood at the MoH Ceremony.

I think you are right Mr. Ricks, Obama does not get enough credit for the way he has been with the Military, especially the SOF Community, he is a lot more open minded and concerned than people give him credit for.

 

GOLD STAR FATHER

12:19 PM ET

September 16, 2011

School Circle

Beer time with the Sergeant was probably the best intel brief the CinC had this month.

 

DMDENNIS

1:31 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Agreed!

I was thinking the same thing.

 

RVN SF VET

1:03 PM ET

September 16, 2011

THE EMBODIMENT OF Auftragstaktik

First, there were two Navy Crosses that day and Army CPT Swenson is being put in for the MoH by GEN Allen for his actions that day - he was the police advisor constantly calling for IDF and he also went back in with Meyer after his own rescue to get others out of the fire sack..

As Bing West points out in his comprehensive account in yesterday's Wall Street Journal; the bulk of those attending the ceremony were the troops from the fight - mostly Marine NCOs. That too shows class. CJ Chivers in the NYT also highlights the photographer in attendance who lost his legs in similar Afghan combat. Both West and Chivers were Marine Infantry Captains and both (Bing is 72) still hump with the troops.

This young Corporal (at the time) led by example and two officers followed. Meyer with SSGT Juan Rodriguez-Chavez (Navy Cross) driving, had to keep changing vehicles as each was shot to pieces under them. Meyers dismounted each time to retrieve the wounded and dead. He himself was wounded in the right arm. On his final gun run, with a Kiowa overhead to assist, he found his 4 dead advisory team buddies. As Bing's article notes, all did not go well that day as an unidentified platoon refused to assist and supporting commands refused to provide indirect fires.

Against orders, Corporal Meyer followed a higher commander's intent - leave no one behind. He exercised initiative and dogged persistence in the face of overwhelming odds - 60 fighters from Pakistan with mortars in a fixed ambush. His direct fire killed no less than 8 enemy. The battle lasted over 6 hours so this was sustained heroism rarely if ever seen. Contrary to the thoughts of one of Tom's guests, this junior leader was not trained for this mission, but he exercised the principle of Auftragstaktik in the extreme.

 

ZATHRAS

1:43 PM ET

September 16, 2011

President Obama is actually

President Obama is actually very good with people, with an astonishingly wide variety of people in fact.

He's just not experienced with people who have spent many years in the military. Also, a lot of his administration's dealings with the military must necessarily pass through subordinates of Obama's whose ability to "get" people from backgrounds other than their own is much less than his.

 

MORANI YA SIMBA

2:29 PM ET

September 16, 2011

This should become tradition

I think President Obama was very right to agree to have a beer with this brave Marine. Considering the brave deeds of one and the honorable office of the other I am not sure who was more honored by having this beer.

But I think it gives a nice low-key touch to the otherwise formal ceremony of bestowing of this medal. Therefore I think all future winners of the Medal of Honor should be invited to a similar treat with their Commander-in-Chief and similarly winners of the Victoria Cross should be invited to a beer (or whiskey or glass of wine as their taste dictates) with their Prime Minister, whether British, Canadian, Australian or New Zealand. I should also like for Danish combat troops who win the "Medalje for Tapperhed" (Medal for Bravery) to meet Denmark's new Prime Minister, Mrs. Thorning-Smidt, for a drink and a chat as an informal tribute to their heroism.

There is a nice scene in this film where Churchill meets a Victoria Cross winner from the Battle of Britain. I do not know if the quotes are authentic but they seem plausible enough. The meeting begins around 7:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tjk9ur05hk&feature=related

 

HRAVENLANDEYE

4:12 PM ET

September 16, 2011

I somehow suspect that Dakota

I somehow suspect that Dakota was a little tongue-tied, at least at first. Perhaps he did a little pre-gaming before the sit down... Whether you agree with his politics or no, President Obama is still the Commander in Chief of the most powerful nation on Earth. Still, I hope that they were able to find some common ground and have a conversation like two regular men.

 

TYRTAIOS

4:37 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Young former Sergeant Meyer

Young former Sergeant Meyer doesn't strike me as being too tongue-tied as a whole. I believe when the President first called to inform him personally of his award, Meyer asked that he call back during his lunch break, since he was busy with construction mission tactics. : )

 

GOLD STAR FATHER

4:52 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Ha!!

He also obviously talked the President into buying the beer too. Whatta guy.

 

DOPE ON A ROPE

9:08 PM ET

September 16, 2011

There have got to be more...

I am going to pound away at this one more time, but surely someone else besides me is interested in the fact that Obama has awarded so many more MoHs than Bush. One could surmise, perhaps, that GW and his people were maybe reluctant to bestow the MoH?

David Bellavia deserves the Medal of Honor. Hands down. Google him. In any other war, he would have been awarded The Medal. In this one, he gets an SSM.

If I had one moment to tell Obama something, I'd say that there needs to be a board convened to review every SSM and DSC awarded in OIF and OEF. Promise you there are MoH worthy actions in there.

 

RVN SF VET

6:46 AM ET

September 17, 2011

Although .....

the President could order such a review, the President does not decide who gets what medal. Service staffs and boards make these decisions. GEN Allen has begun remedying one such oversight in recommending Army CPT Swenson for the MoH in this same battle.

 

FG42

8:14 AM ET

September 17, 2011

Just curious about a sentence

Just curious about a sentence that I read in a news report about the MOH to Sgt Myer. It mentioned something about an investigation into the actions of a neighboring unit, which refused to assist Sgt Meyer's unit. RVNSFVET, you have sources....do you know anything about that?

 

RVN SF VET

11:04 PM ET

September 17, 2011

@FG42 THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE ISSUES

There was a "platoon" which refused to assist. They have never been publicly identified. I'll make a leap and guess that it was an Afghan platoon. Otherwise I believe yet another US Army officer would have been reprimanded. It would be hard to believe that it was a USMC platoon, although CPL Meyer went in against orders. Bing West knows because he was nearby in a COP.

There was a US Army hierarchy which denied IDF support to the advisory unit and its Afghan Army and Border Police units. The Marines were embedded with the Afghan Army and US Army CPT Swenson was advising the Border Police unit. The Marine LT requested artillery (the whole village was an ambush with villagers observed resupplying ammunition) and CPT Swenson persisted in fire mission requests throughout the battle. At some point the Marine LT was killed and CPT Swenson kept up his fire mission calls and once rescued, went back in to retrieve the 4 dead Marine advisors. Three US Army officers have received career ending letters of reprimand for denying support. They have provided two different excuses for their actions. It has not been made clear, but it sounds like they initially denied support owing to the proximity of villagers. Later, perhaps when giving testimony, they switched to or added their inability to ID the location of US units. Higher command did not buy it.

The Taliban (or foreign fighters) occupied the mountainsides flanking the valley in addition to being in the village. I don't know if the Kiowa pilot opened fire, but helicopter pilots were credited with spotting the bodies of the advisors and guiding Meyer to them.

Now that GEN Allen has submitted CPT Swenson for consideration for the MoH, I think more details will come out. CPT Swenson resigned from the Army - you can infer why.

None of this distracts from or clouds CPL Meyer's sustained 6 hours of heroism and leadership by example. Remember, he led officers into the battle.

 

FG42

8:38 AM ET

September 18, 2011

@RVN SF VET

Many thanks for the succinct and timely update. I totally agree with you: Cpl (now Sgt) Meyer stands tall, the best example of the young folks that we send out in harm's way. Thank God this wasn't a posthumous award. I wish our political and financial leaders could show some of the courage and unselfishness demonstrated by Sgt Meyer.

 

RVN SF VET

10:19 AM ET

September 18, 2011

@FG42 IT WAS A US ARMY PLATOON.

From Bing West:

"When Cpl. Meyer and Sgt. Rodriguez-Chavez again dropped off the wounded in the rear, they bumped into a backup American platoon in armored vehicles. The platoon refused to join them, so they went back in for a third time with no backup, driving into a torrent of automatic-weapons fire so a group of trapped American advisers could escape. Cpl. Meyer watched women and children darting among the houses, carrying ammunition to the jihadists. "

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

12:57 PM ET

September 18, 2011

@RVN & Dope on a Rope

RVN-Is that confirmed that it was a US Army Platoon that refused to give support? I hope that is wrong.

Dope on a Rope- there are more for sure, I can think of at least two Cross winners from the Navy and two Cross Winners from the USMC that I shake my head at and wonder why no Big Blue, that is just to my direct knowledge. I think part of the problem might be that there has been some award inflation by some branches and there is always a fear, especially on the MoH that it could happen with that too.

 

RVN SF VET

2:08 PM ET

September 18, 2011

@ Otter Bing West Was There At The Time

He had spoken to the participants after and perhaps before as well. He appears to have formed a personal relationship with and affection for SGT Dakota Meyer. West is a 72 year old Marine Infantry veteran (CPT) who still humps the hills with Afghan deployed Marines.

If West says it was a US Army platoon, that's A1 intel as far as I'm concerned. I can explain it, but not support the platoon leader's action or inaction. The AO had an Army chain of command in which these Afghan troops were operating. The Army officers who received the letters of reprimand were over that platoon leader and gave him a direct order not to engage. That is the time for the platoon leader to say, "I am receiving you weak and broken, say again. OR "Roger, WILCO, I am attacking."" (From a purely technical point of view - that would not fly.)

But then CPL Meyer had a different frame of reference. In my mind that would have been, "Fuck it, I'm a Marine and those are Marines down there." At the minimum, the Army platoon leader should have given his higher a better appreciation for the situation and he could have walked the rounds in. He also could have provided overwatching fires for Meyer. Of course, where did Meyer get all those replacement vehicles from? I'm guessing that as they were shot from under him, the Army platoon gave him their vehicles. God, I hope so.

The silent man who may have the best insights is CPT Swenson who was ignored by the Army and will now be recognized - I hope.

 

RVN SF VET

5:13 PM ET

September 18, 2011

"60 Minutes" Interview Tonight

David Martin will interview Dakota Meyer tonight, Sunday at 1900 EDT.

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

8:19 PM ET

September 18, 2011

@RVN & Dope on a Rope

Wow, depressing knowledge to have. I imagine the young Capt. got out due what went on at that fire fight.

 

RVN SF VET

9:54 PM ET

September 18, 2011

CPT SWENSON WAS AT THE CEREMONY IN A SUIT.

He looks like a shy man and is not physically imposing. It would be great to show that heroes come in all shapes and sizes. Frankly, he's the last guy you would think of saddling-up and going back in shooting - but he did. A Border Police advisor is likely an MP I guess. SF used to advise the Thai Border Police.

The Colonel who did the 15-6 investigation spoke highly of CPT Swenson's actions tonight on "60 Minutes."

 

OTHER RANKS

12:35 AM ET

September 20, 2011

SGT David Bleak

RVN:

I was reminded of that the other day in an exhibit of MOH recipients, including SGT David Bleak for his actions in Korea. Photos of him then show a big guy with a double chin, definitely not the recruiting poster image of a soldier. Yet he did his job and more.

Incidentally, Wikipedia notes that SGT Bleak passed away on the same day as PFC Desmond Doss, the only living conscientious objector to be awarded the MOH. Two others were awarded posthumously.

 

FG42

10:05 AM ET

September 18, 2011

FYI: President Obama's words as he presented the MOH

Let me tell the story. I want you to imagine it's September 8, 2009, just before dawn. A patrol of Afghan forces and their American trainers is on foot, making their way up a narrow valley, heading into a village to meet with elders. And suddenly, all over the village, the lights go out. And that's when it happens. About a mile away, Dakota, who was then a corporal, and Staff Sergeant Juan Rodriguez-Chavez, could hear the ambush over the radio. It was as if the whole valley was exploding. Taliban fighters were unleashing a firestorm from the hills, from the stone houses, even from the local school.

And soon, the patrol was pinned down, taking ferocious fire from three sides. Men were being wounded and killed, and four Americans — Dakota's friends — were surrounded. Four times, Dakota and Juan asked permission to go in; four times they were denied. It was, they were told, too dangerous. But one of the teachers in his high school once said, "When you tell Dakota he can't do something, he's is going to do it." And as Dakota said of his trapped teammates, "Those were my brothers, and I couldn't just sit back and watch."

The story of what Dakota did next will be told for generations. He told Juan they were going in. Juan jumped into a Humvee and took the wheel; Dakota climbed into the turret and manned the gun. They were defying orders, but they were doing what they thought was right. So they drove straight into a killing zone, Dakota's upper body and head exposed to a blizzard of fire from AK-47s and machine guns, from mortars and rocket-propelled grenades.

Coming upon wounded Afghan soldiers, Dakota jumped out and loaded each of the wounded into the Humvee, each time exposing himself to all that enemy fire. They turned around and drove those wounded back to safety. Those who were there called it the most intense combat they'd ever seen. Dakota and Juan would have been forgiven for not going back in. But as Dakota says, you don't leave anyone behind.

For a second time, they went back — back into the inferno; Juan at the wheel, swerving to avoid the explosions all around them; Dakota up in the turret — when one gun jammed, grabbing another, going through gun after gun. Again they came across wounded Afghans. Again Dakota jumped out, loaded them up and brought them back to safety.

For a third time, they went back — insurgents running right up to the Humvee, Dakota fighting them off. Up ahead, a group of Americans, some wounded, were desperately trying to escape the bullets raining down. Juan wedged the Humvee right into the line of fire, using the vehicle as a shield. With Dakota on the guns, they helped those Americans back to safety as well.

For a fourth time, they went back. Dakota was now wounded in the arm. Their vehicle was riddled with bullets and shrapnel. Dakota later confessed, "I didn't think I was going to die. I knew I was." But still they pushed on, finding the wounded, delivering them to safety.

And then, for a fifth time, they went back — into the fury of that village, under fire that seemed to come from every window, every doorway, every alley. And when they finally got to those trapped Americans, Dakota jumped out. And he ran toward them. Drawing all those enemy guns on himself. Bullets kicking up the dirt all around him. He kept going until he came upon those four Americans, laying where they fell, together as one team.

Dakota and the others who had joined him knelt down, picked up their comrades and — through all those bullets, all the smoke, all the chaos — carried them out, one by one. Because, as Dakota says, "That's what you do for a brother."

Dakota says he'll accept this medal in their name. So today, we remember the husband who loved the outdoors —Lieutenant Michael Johnson. The husband and father they called "Gunny J" — Gunnery Sergeant Edwin Johnson. The determined Marine who fought to get on that team — Staff Sergeant Aaron Kenefick. The medic who gave his life tending to his teammates — Hospitalman Third Class James Layton. And a soldier wounded in that battle who never recovered — Sergeant First Class Kenneth Westbrook.

Dakota, I know that you've grappled with the grief of that day; that you've said your efforts were somehow a "failure" because your teammates didn't come home. But as your Commander-in-Chief, and on behalf of everyone here today and all Americans, I want you to know it's quite the opposite. You did your duty, above and beyond, and you kept the faith with the highest traditions of the Marine Corps that you love.

Because of your Honor, 36 men are alive today. Because of your Courage, four fallen American heroes came home, and — in the words of James Layton's mom — they could lay their sons to rest with dignity. Because of your Commitment — in the thick of the fight, hour after hour — a former Marine who read about your story said that you showed how "in the most desperate, final hours…our brothers and God will not forsake us." And because of your humble example, our kids — especially back in Columbia, Kentucky, in small towns all across America — they'll know that no matter who you are or where you come from, you can do great things as a citizen and as a member of the American family.

Therein lies the greatest lesson of that day in the valley, and the truth that our men and women in uniform live out every day. "I was part of something bigger," Dakota has said, part of a team "that worked together, lifting each other up and working toward a common goal. Every member of our team was as important as the other." So in keeping with Dakota's wishes for this day, I want to conclude by asking now-Gunnery Sergeant Rodriguez-Chavez and all those who served with Dakota — the Marines, Army, Navy — to stand and accept thanks of a grateful nation.

Every member of our team is as important as the other. That's a lesson that we all have to remember — as citizens, and as a nation — as we meet the tests of our time, here at home and around the world.

To our Marines, to all our men and women in uniform, to our fellow Americans, let us always be faithful. And as we prepare for the reading of the citation, let me say, God bless you, Dakota. God bless our Marines and all who serve. And God bless the United States of America. Semper Fi.

 

HUNTER

11:58 AM ET

September 18, 2011

Important take-away

Dakota saved Afghan and American alike. I don't know what the right answer is, but I know that we - as soldiers - make soldier-friends around the world. Dakota didn't abandon his peers, regardless of their rank, race, or nationality. Will we as a nation do as well?

My Dad lived among and had infinite respect for his South Vietnamese peers, he never forgot the ultimate betrayal of the man, his Vietnamese friend and counterpart, he called the bravest man he ever knew.

To Dakota, great job, I hope the civilian world treats you with the honor you deserve. If not, know that we'll always embrace you.

 

FG42

12:38 PM ET

September 19, 2011

@Hunter

Hunter, it's great to read about your Dad and his strong loyalty to his Vietnamese comrades. It's too common today to hear generalizations from people who denigrate the ARVN troops across-the-board. It's true that many ARVN units were unreliable, and in all cases this was due to extremely poor leadership. But there were some very tough units that won the respect of US forces, like the Airborne, Ranger, and Marine battalions. And some regular divisions were outstanding, like the ARVN 1st Division. It and its commanding general were cited by US officers (like Norman Schwartzkopf) as being as good as any US division. After the collapse in 1975, US advisors worked hard to get the general and his family out of Vietnam and into the US.

See: http://themonsoondispatch.blogspot.com/2010/07/arvn-general-ngo-quang-truong.html

 

FG42

8:13 AM ET

September 19, 2011

Army CPT Swenson's story

If you're interested, here's a good article about CPT Swenson, the Army officer who was with Cpt Meyer. His comments echo a lot of this blog's previous posts about "individual initiative" and "micromanagement by distant staff officers."

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2011/09/military-dakota-meyer-will-swenson-ganjgal-afghanistan-091311w/

 

RVN SF VET

11:28 AM ET

September 19, 2011

ARMY TIMES NCO READERS' COMMENTS

Note that a few readers' comments at the end of this article come from named NCOs who say that they were in the 10th Mountain TOC or had met CPT Swenson at Joyce or had examined his shot-up, Border Police, Ford Ranger truck

Swenson wears the Ranger Tab, but an officer at the 10th Mountain didn't like CPT Swenson's hair.

Lastly, by the book, fire-support had been coordinated prior to going in. It also appears that the Major in charge of the TOC (battalion S-3?) wandered in and out and did not accord the battle the gravity it deserved. The comments attributed to CPT Swenson in the 15-6 recount previous incidents of second-guessing from higher far removed from the scene.

CPT Swenson's senior NCO, an SFC, was awarded the Bronze Star without "V" Device. Hit in the face and neck, he died one month later at Walter Read. If you speak up and rock the boat - the Army shows its dislike for such actions. Starting with ANACONDA, perhaps there is something wrong with the 10th Mountain's culture.

 

WHISKEYPAPA

10:08 AM ET

September 19, 2011

1984

I am delighted that Sgt. Meyer got the CMoH. But he shouldn't have, because he shouldn't have been there, nor any other of our guys.

The whole thing with him having a beer with the prez is like backstory from '1984'.

Walt

 

RVN SF VET

3:20 PM ET

September 19, 2011

Contemporaneous McClatcy News Report

< http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/09/08/75036/were-pinned-down-4-us-marines.html >

Watch the video as well. I am disquieted to learn that the ETT Team Leader was a USMC Major Williams prsent with his counterpart at the battle. Nowhere has he ever been mentioned. What the heck did he do? The reporter continually refers to the actions of Army CPT Swenson and Marine LT Fabayo - both near him.

 

RVN SF VET

3:20 PM ET

September 19, 2011

Contemporaneous McClatcy News Report

< http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/09/08/75036/were-pinned-down-4-us-marines.html >

Watch the video as well. I am disquieted to learn that the ETT Team Leader was a USMC Major Williams prsent with his counterpart at the battle. Nowhere has he ever been mentioned. What the heck did he do? The reporter continually refers to the actions of Army CPT Swenson and Marine LT Fabayo - both near him.

 

POL-MIL FSO

9:59 AM ET

September 20, 2011

Different Chains of Command

None of the media accounts seem to have picked up the fact that the advisors - the Marine ETTs (Embedded Training Team) and Army BMTs (Border Police Mentoring Team) such as CPT Swenson - were under a different Chain of Command than the maneuver battalion in the AOR (1-32 IN). The ETTs and BMTs worked for CSTC-A (Combined Security Transition Command Afghanistan) while 1-32 IN of the 10th Mountain Division was under RC-East. There is frequently tension between the maneuver battalion, CSTC-A advisors (and SOF elements) who work in the same AOR, compounded in this case by the rivalry between the Marines and Army. (A Marine officer who served as an ETT in the same province during a previous rotation told me that relations between Marine ETTs and the maneuver battalion from the 173d Airborne Brigade were not good.)

That said, Bing West in his book "The Wrong War" noted that the 1-32 IN Commander had good relations with the Commanders of the Afghan Army Battalion and the Border Police unit. These good relations presumably extended to the CSTC-A advisors attached to these units. However, West also notes that the Battalion Commander was on leave during this fight. It was either the 1-32 In XO and/or S-3 who made the decisions from the Camp Joyce TOC to deny the fire support requests. Reading between the lines of West's book, the 1-32 IN Commander may have made a different call if he had been there.

Finally, per RVN SF Vet's comment, Major Williams, the senior Marine ETT was apparently wounded early in the battle, as was the senior Marine NCO, Ist Sergeant Garza. The severity of MAJ Williams' wound is not clear, West mentions rock shard shrapnel in the elbow while the Army Times article about CPT Swenson mentions a Gun Shot Wound. 1st Sergeant Garza was clearly out of the fight with a concussion and blown eardrums but reportedly still wanted to go back out after being evacuated to Camp Joyce.

 

RVN SF VET

1:25 PM ET

September 20, 2011

RELATIONS AFFECTING SUPPORT

The NCO comments to the Army Times article were reassuring. To a man, the TOC NCOs treated "Troops In Contact" with the same priority. The officers, who wandered in and out (per 15-6) of the TOC, did not seem to accord these troops in contact the same priority of fires they *might* have shown their organic troops. The joint (Army/USMC) 15-6 emphasizes that troops in contact are always *the* priority and that subordinate commanders are to be given the maximum freedom of maneuver.

We need a timeline. I want to know how soon this occurred after GEN McChrystal issued his new guidelines toi minimize civilian casualties. The McClatchy reporter makes it sound like it was a recent implementation. If so, this error in judgement was echoed in several other denials of supporting fires across Afghanistan. The is one thing that all commanders, regardless of rank, must realize; that their orders are interpreted and filtered down through the command echelons. In a careerist military, many believe that it is worse to commit an error of commission than omission. There are those who will risk the lives of others to protect their careers - especially when they don't go home to the same base.

It was inattention and not caring that got those men killed followed by careerist decision-making. Or, if you wish to be kins, unimaginative, thoughtless decision-making. This is another Wanant. I'm guessing that the Major, the S3, was the highest ranking officer censured in this matter. Yet there was a command climate that permitted this type of attitude. After all, this wasn't WWII where troops in contact was the rule. This was Afghanistan where you could step in it at any time and supporting elements had to be ready.

On another note, my apologies to MAJ Williams. A bullet to the arm can incapacitate you and there is no way for armchair tacticians to know your pain. You had CPT Swenson doing what you wanted done and having an O-4 make the same requests might not have made an iota of difference.

The McClatchy embed makes one thing very clear. In the heat of that battle, he had no idea what CPL Meyer was doing. The reporter was busting his hump evacuating the wounded to the LZ while carrying the rifle LT Fabayo gave him.

 

GREGBUNT

5:44 AM ET

October 9, 2011

Men were

Men were being wounded and killed, and four Americans — Dakota's friends — were surrounded snowblower. Four times, Dakota and Juan asked permission to go in; four times they were denied. It was, they were told, too dangerous. But one of the teachers in his high school once said, "When you tell Dakota he can't do something, he's is going to do it.

 

NATASHAV

2:13 AM ET

October 15, 2011

The McClatchy reporter makes

The McClatchy reporter makes it sound like it was a recent implementation. If so, this error in judgement was echoed in several other denials of supporting fires across Afghanistan. The is one thing that all kindle fire review commanders, regardless of rank, must realize; that their orders are interpreted and filtered down through the command echelons.

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More