Thursday, September 1, 2011 - 10:44 AM

I see that the Navy ousted the CO of its "Beachmaster Unit 2," of which I never had heard. (No. 16) The comments of sailors on the Navy Times site ran in support of him, with several saying he is a good leader and that anyone could be nailed for misuse of government resources. It reminds me of what the drill instructors on Parris Island told me: "If you're not breaking the rules you're not doing your job."
And the CO of Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs, New York, was dismissed from his position after being busted for DWI. For those of you keeping score at home, that's 17 for the year.
Also, the former XO of the USS Gettysburg also got the old heave-ho, for sexual misconduct. Apparently he was facing a choice of court-martial or retirement. The former XO of the USS Roosevelt went him one better and got a year's imprisonment for wrongful sexual contact and such.
And a shipyard inspector was sentenced to three years for lying about welds he claimed to have inspected on submarines. It is interesting to think about making him serve his term aboard the subs he inspected. But that would "unusual," and perhaps "cruel."
I spent part of my August reading the crisply written memoirs of Paul Nitze, who among other things was secretary of the Navy in the mid-1960s. One day he turned to his aide, Adm. Elmo "Bud" Zumwalt, and complained about a personnel problem, "Why does this have to happen to me?" Zumwalt responded aptly that, "If you have more than a million men working for you, every unpleasant problem that has one chance in a million of occurring will occur at least once." (P. 254)
Beachmasters are the Navy guys that actually land with the Marines when they hit the beach. They sometimes claim to be there before the Marines. Not sure. But they're pretty cool guys. They drive up in their LARCs and LCUs, set up radios, plant guide posts, and act as traffic control for the follow-on elements after the initial assault waves.
As military units go, they have a pretty extensive track record stretching back to Normandy, Anzio, Tarawa, Peleliu, etc. Although I reckon they got shot at a lot more then than they do now.
They wore yellow tabs on the legs of their sateen trousers and a yellow tab on their cover/helmet back in the 80's. Like LSB wear red tabs on theirs. Both to separate them from the ordinary Marines who were supposed to land and move directly off the beachhead. Not sure about these days.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beachmaster_Unit_Two
Beachmasters have control of LCUs, LCACs, and any other landing craft from the time the landing craft leave the ship until they land on shore. They set up offload lanes, clear obstacles, sort out craft that are fouling the beach, and coordinate with landing support company to ensure the smooth flow of materiel from ship to shore.
It sounds like their CO either lost something expensive or broke something expensive and disposed of it improperly without correctly reporting hte loss. Depending on whether or not he covered his ass properly, there's a supply officer somewhere either shaking his head at his CO's shennanigans, or very, very sad because he got fired and is possibly facing criminal charges.
At the top of the page a foto of a boat in modest need of repair. And then you suggest that submarine duty is to be compared with hard time. Two shots against submarines and you're only back a day. Geez...
Welcome back.
That wasn't a shot against submarines or the brave people who crew them. But can you imagine what the crew would think of having sail with them the jerk who approved bad welds on the boat they are in?
Best,
Tom
That wasn't a shot against submarines or the brave people who crew them. But can you imagine what the crew would think of having sail with them the jerk who approved bad welds on the boat they are in?
Best,
Tom
It's not the first time that bad QA has inflicted itself on the submarine force. When these things come up, the fix is two-fold: restrict the submarine's operations (usually by restricting maximum operating depth) until the out-of-spec problem is resolved; do what's needed to bring the out-of-spec situation back inside the QA program's requirements.
The real problems caused by guys like this rogue inspector are that it can cost a ton of money to reinspect and it takes the boat off-line while it's being done. We learned our lessons after THRESHER. The SubSafe program was invented and it plus the strong requirements of the Submarine Quality Assurance Program are matters of grave importance to all in the Force and all who support them. And when it gets screwed up, heads do roll and it is always taken serously.
And these are not the first hull-welding problems encountered. Far more serious was the situation in HAMMERHEAD some decades back. While she was being fitted out and in the water pier side, the shipyard put the primary welding ground for the boat pier side rather than attaching it to the hull itself. This created a ground loop through seawater that attacked the primary welds at the cylindrical pressure-hull sections and electrically leached out the welding material that joined these inches-thick sections of HY-80 steel. It took months to reweld and reinspect the hull, a process that starts with attaching electric heat strips that raise the steel to 300 deg F before the welding even starts.
Being one month out of the Navy, this news still let's me down. I'd like to see the number of chiefs who are forced into retirement.
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE