I did this last
year, but we can learn about military affairs from Warren Buffett every year.
The military is not a business, and should not be run like one. But still, the
defense establishment could learn a lot from a
person as wise as Buffett.
If I could, I would
ban all those business fad management books I see senior officers reading and
instead make them study the annual reports from Buffett's company, Berkshire Hathaway
Inc. You may not know Berkshire Hathaway, but if you buy insurance from
Geico, drink Coca-Cola, eat See's Candies, read the Buffalo News, use goods transported by the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe Railroad, or wear Fruit of the Loom underwear, then products and
services of companies owned in part or whole by Berkshire are touching your
life.
For example, the
U.S. military, and especially the Army, have been plagued by micromanagement
since the mid-1950s, so long that no one now in the Army has much experience in
any other way to run it. I see generals constantly scurrying endlessly to
meetings where they often sit in the dark while subordinates read aloud to them
bedtime stories (AKA Powerpoint briefings). Well, there is another way, and it is laid out by Buffett in his annual report
for 2010:
At Berkshire,
managers can focus on running their businesses: They are not subjected to
meetings at headquarters nor financing worries nor Wall Street harassment. They
simply get a letter from me every two years…and call me when they wish.
And their wishes do differ: There are managers to whom I have not talked in the
last year, while there is one with whom I talk almost daily. Our trust is in
people rather than process. A "hire well, manage little" code suits both them
and me.
Berkshire's CEOs
come in many forms. Some have MBAs; others never finished college. Some use
budgets and are by-the-book types; others operate by the seat of their pants.
Our team resembles a baseball squad composed of all-stars having vastly
different batting styles. Changes in our line-up are seldom required.
(p. 7)
Imagine a military
run like that, that trusted people rather than process, a military where the
Army chief of staff could boast that XVIII Airborne Corps is run so well that
he has kept the commanding general in place for several years, and hasn't seen
him in two years or even talked to him in one. But, the chief of staff would
continue, he does talk to the Army commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan daily, in
part because they need his help, and in part because he isn't distracted by
checking on the XVIII Airborne Corps. My view: People who spend most of their
days in regularly scheduled meetings too much probably are wasting their time
and others'.
Also, because
Buffett keeps successful people in place, staffs and subordinate managers are
not constantly in turmoil and adjusting. Instead of constantly adapting to new
bossses, they can focus on the tasks at hand. And the boss can leave them alone
because he knows how to tell when they need help and when they don't.
Read More
(48)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE