Wednesday, November 24, 2010 - 11:25 AM

By David J. Morris
Best Defense red cell correspondentHeroes and myths die hard among fighting men. The troops love them for the added dimension they provide to the savage grind of field life, the feeling they can give a guy that tells him that he is part of a grand saga, something that will outlive his own individual destiny. Eccentric heroes and acts of valor exist for those who need them most as evidence that a greater depth to life is possible, that sacrifice can have meaning. That, with luck, they will be remembered by history. And yet, for some reason, outside of the ranks such ideas about heroism and destiny never fail to come across as anything other than primitive fantasy, the sort of thing that if brought up in conversation at certain hipster parties will cause people to stare at you as if you had just given them a Hitler salute.
Nevertheless, these are exactly the sorts of ideals that are being tested in extremis in Sangin, a small town in southern Afghanistan where a single unit, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marines, has been fighting to make good on all on the hot talk about the new, improved, industrial-strength Surge and the Undeniable Genius of David Petraeus and has, as a direct result, suffered some of the worst casualties in recent history, losses of a magnitude that haven't been seen since the darkest days of the Iraqi insurgency, indicative of a vicious, locked-in fight beginning to collapse in on itself like a dying star, annihilating anything that drifts too close. Fifteen killed. Forty-nine wounded. Nearly seven percent of the entire battalion dead or wounded. All in just thirty days.
Of course, to the average American, there is nothing, absolutely nothing new here. In an age of stereotypes, what is a Marine battalion other than a gang of unfortunates and semi-literate savages, all of them hailing no doubt, from the unwashed, Jesus-addled, gun-loving middle of the country, colliding head-on into the hard facts of life for the non-college-bound? Sacrifice is for saps, so the thinking goes, God knows why people go into the service these days and to take anything more than a passing interest in the whole awful show is to somehow be complicit in it.
Still, whatever else may be wrong and misguided about the war, like the inadequacy of the Iraq-centric techniques being applied to a scene that bears little resemblance on a tribal level to that country, there is something immutable, almost Homeric, happening in Sangin. It's the story of a unit filled with boys far, far from home, consumed by ideals older than the Old Testament about death, honor and human destiny.
Within the tight-knit world of the Marine grunt, 3/5 occupies a unique position. It has seen more combat than probably any unit in the Corps and been rightly decorated for it: its members have been awarded seven Navy Crosses, more than any other Marine battalion by a significant margin. At one point, there were more Navy Cross winners from 3/5 than winners of the equivalent army award in the entire U.S. Army. During the second battle for Fallujah in November 2004, it spearheaded the offensive, seizing the notorious Jolan neighborhood, home to some of the war's most hardened insurgents and took twenty-one dead. Marines from other units have been known to talk about "Darkhorse" as 3/5 is known, with a mixture of awe and gratitude, awe at their combat record and gratitude that their unit hadn't suffered as many casualties as they had.
Of course, there was more to it than just Glory and Honor and local Iraqis, understandably, harbored certain convictions about Darkhorse. At the height of the 2007 Surge, as 3/5 was preparing to return to Fallujah, this time for occupation duty, the local Iraqi police force caught wind of it and complained to their American counterparts, demanding that anybody else other than "the butchers of Fallujah" be allowed to patrol their city. Even the Marines who 3/5 was set to replace had their doubts.
And for some Darkhorse Marines, the battalion has, at times, come to feel like an electron shit magnet, the worst sort of hard luck outfit, a unit where even the biggest storehouse of personal karma was sure to taxed to the limit, or beyond, out into that dim country where a guy begins to think of his own life as something not to be taken too seriously, death the final trip, something to be savored first-hand. Let it bleed, son, let it bleed. When I was first embedded with 3/5 in 2006, one lance corporal complained, "We always get the shit assignments." Now, a reporter who spent any time at all in Iraq was sure to hear this sort of talk from tired grunts, it was the kind of personal Delta blues that all soldiers lapse into from time-to-time, but in this case, the Marine had a point: the day I'd arrived at their camp in Habbaniyah, word was just beginning to filter in about two of the battalion's most popular Marines who had been killed by an IED, including the gunner for the battalion commander's vehicle, a burly, joke-a-minute surfer named Morrow. Hard times are the lingua franca of the Corps, there has never been any doubt on that point, but this just seemed somehow unfair.
Standing there sweating in the battalion adjutant's office that afternoon, taking in the grim news, I could feel the heat and anger the Marines around me were giving off like an invisible sun. The fraternal mystery of the Corps never ran deeper for me than it did on that day.
And what a mystery! The idiosyncrasies that make 3/5 and the Marines in general unique were the very things that many reporters and soldiers in Iraq found outrageous and even criminal. If you'd just spent a couple months embedded in Anbar and then dropped back into Baghdad with say, the 1st or the 4th Infantry Division, you were likely to get this:
"Where'd you come from?"
"Out west, AO Denver."
"With the fucking Marines? I know how they do it, it's like 'hey diddle-diddle, straight up the middle!' -- Fuck that, man!"
And on a certain level, it was hard to argue with them. There was always some vague, unexplainable feeling that came with being embedded with the Marines. Call it bad fate or bad luck or a conviction that living up to your own mythology was more important than living at all, but Marine units I've embedded with have always borne a different relationship with death than any army unit I spent time with. The GIs would gripe good-naturedly about all the close calls they'd had, treating death like some carping, churlish creditor, something to be resisted, staved off, for sure, but in the end, something to be ignored if at all possible. But among many of the Marines I patrolled alongside -- and 3/5 certainly stands paramount among these -- there was a tendency to get hip to the madness, the horror and rot of it, to embrace the darker angels of human nature to a degree that made your skin flush hot for a moment until you remembered that they were the ones watching your back after all, and for you and your admittedly-selfish purposes, that was a generally good thing. Madness, mythology, bad midnight sweats, these are all temporary things, no? But death, that thing, that other thing that happened to some and not to others and no, no, not to you, never to you, that thing was permanent. It was a little bit of warped, hard Chicago faith that some guys would inevitable come up with, living proof of what Sinatra was reputed to have said to a struggling alcoholic friend of his: "Whatever gets you through the night, pal." Selah.
But -- and this must be admitted -- the mythology works both ways. To the old mujaheddin fighting the Marines in Sangin, the town must seem something like the Alamo, a place to stand and die, a treasured redoubt where a piece of eternity resides. Just like armies, places grow their own mythologies like ivy around old academic buildings and Sangin has long been a trophy to the muj. The British Royal Marines patrolled the town for almost five years and never quite got their arms around it, and in the end, the town accounted for fully one-third of all British casualties in Afghanistan. And according to the NATO commander at the time, the troops there saw "the fiercest fighting involving British troops since the Korean War."
I suspect it would shock the hell out of a lot of Marines to learn how much they have in common with the men they are fighting. It's like what Mao said: one invariably comes to resemble one's enemies. But then, for a young man in the heat of events, this is the most inconvenient of truths and one that can only be taught over the decades and only if he survives the war. It's the same lesson that the first banzai charges taught the men of the First Marine Division on Guadalcanal, what Pacific War vet William Manchester and author of Goodbye, Darkness, learned when he looked into the eyes of a Japanese veteran of Okinawa at an observance forty-two years afterward: in the end we learn and are shaped by our enemies and we take on similar mythologies, because, if for no other reason than the current apathetic state of America, who else could know you better, what you've been through, other than the guy who called you there and remade you and stayed with you through to the end?
David J. Morris is a former Marine officer and the author of Storm on the Horizon: Khafji -- The Battle that Changed the Course of the Gulf War (Free Press). His work has appeared in the Virginia Quarterly Review, Slate and The Best American Nonrequired Reading series.
I think I remember that Morris and I both deployed to Okinawa with 3/5 years ago. I like his writing, and his book.
This article reminds me of 'Dispatches' by Micheal Herr. From page 110 of my well-worn paperback version:
"And, naturally, the poor bastards [Marines] were famous all over Vietnam. If you spent some weeks up there and afterward joined an Army outfit of, say, the 4th or 25th Division you'd get this:
"Where you been? We ain't seen you?"
"Up in I Corps."
"With the Marines?"
“That’s what’s up there.”
“Well, all I got to say is Good Luck! Marines. Fuck that!”
I was just about to post the same thing re: Dispatches.
I like Morris a lot, and his observational detail is excellent...but it's very derivative of Herr. I've noticed passages from his essays actually carry the same cadence of similar examples from Dispatches. He has a passage about a dry-erase board that's certainly reminiscent of the map of Vietnam that Herr opens Dispatches with.
Frankly, his writing is often a step above "inspired by" Herr. He could probably do more work to find his own style...but he's doing a good job all the same.
"Weak writers borrow, strong writers steal."
Best,
Tom
I actually have Gustav Hasford's (author of Full Metal Jacket/Shorttimers) personal copy of "Dispatches," in which he has annotated a particular passage with the note "Problem - Unreal coincedence. Did I take it from his Esquire article?"
And in fact, a passage from his "Short-Timers" is nearly word-for-word the same as that one in "Dispatches." Different context, identical description.
Only so many ways to tell a war story...
All this talk about Herr is funny since he admitted to fictionalizing a lot of Dispatches in an article in the L.A. Times back in the 90s.
http://articles.latimes.com/1990-04-15/magazine/tm-2121_1_michael-herr
I don't know that Herr says he "fictionalized" it out of whole cloth, but I think I always assumed he used quite a bit of dramatic license to construct a lot of scenes, which he does admit. I've always wondered about that and was glad to see that article, which I've never read.
Nevertheless, nothing about "Dispatches" (or Morris) seems fake, that's the key...it's like they say about "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72," that it's the election's most honest and least accurate account.
I think Morris is a little derivative, but like the above shows, Gustav Hasford copied from Herr, and Herr made the whole thing up! Haha...
from the L.A. Times Herr profile:
"In a chapter about the siege of Khe Sanh, he [Herr] offers a long series of conversations between two friends, a huge, gentle black Marine named Day Tripper and a little naive white Marine named Mayhew. The exchanges ring so true that one wonders, simply on a journalistic level, how he ever managed to record them.
He smiles. "They are totally fictional characters."
They are ?
"Oh, yeah. A lot of 'Dispatches' is fictional. I've said this a lot of times. I have told people over the years that there are fictional aspects to 'Dispatches,' and they look betrayed. They look heartbroken, as if it isn't true anymore. I never thought of 'Dispatches' as journalism. In France they published it as a novel.""
Herr, a great writer, lived in the pre-James Frey era.
Interesting that you didn't quote the next passage as well:
"But, Herr says, "I always carried a notebook. I had this idea--I remember endlessly writing down dialogues. It was all I was really there to do. Very few lines were literally invented. A lot of lines are put into mouths of composite characters. Sometimes I tell a story as if I was present when I wasn't, (which wasn't difficult)--I was so immersed in that talk, so full of it and so steeped in it. A lot of the journalistic stuff I got wrong."
Like what?
"You know, this unit at this place. But it didn't bother me. There is no shortage of regimental histories."
So, like I said, fictional but accurate.
Thanks for the original tip about the article; have a good holiday.
...derivative? in the same way that elmore leonard is derivative of raymond chandler, who's derivative of hammett? seems beside the point, point being what's happening to the Marines in afghanistan.
Eugene Sledge, who wrote, 'With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa' was in Kilo 3/5. As I recall he said then that 3/5 had been in more combat than any other Marine battalion, including France in 1918.
Walt
Great commentary on 3/5, well deserved, based on its rich history. But what of 3/7, the unit 3/5 only a month ago relieved? A narrow-focused bit of PR. Much of the 3/5 discussion, I've noticed, seems to be in a vacuum, as if 3/5 were the first Marine unit to set foot in Sangin. Which of course it isn't.
Great commentary on 3/5, well deserved, based on its rich history. But what of 3/7, the unit 3/5 only a month ago relieved? A narrow-focused bit of PR. Much of the 3/5 discussion, I've noticed, seems to be in a vacuum, as if 3/5 were the first Marine unit to set foot in Sangin. Which of course it isn't.
I just want to say i am a Marine Infantry Squad Leader. I am with 3/7 and was there when we cleared and relieved the british of Sangin. I have fought side by side with my fellow Marines there and i will say this...anyone out there better be sending a prayer up for the 3/5 Marines. Semper Fi.
All it was missing was a hat tip to the fun loving killer and true Butcher of Fallujah, Mattis. Fallujah was the best party Mattis ever had, especially when he used WP against civilians.
"To keep our honor clean"
It was Gen. Mattis that briefed his Marines that every time they hurt an Iraqi they pushed going home a day further away. He appears to been one of the few senior leaders who in any way thought outside the box.
I always like any opportunity to point out what a complete idiot Gen. Oodierno was when he had his guys arresting every Iraqi male they could catch and sending them to Abu Ghraib.
It makes quite a contrast.
Walt
I can not argue with your comments about the sadist Odierno. There is no doubt he should be investigated by a war crimes tribunal. His actions made alot of enemies for the US.
Mattis knew from the begining the invasion of Iraq was an aggressive attack. Mattis was part of the conspiracy to commit aggressive war and should be tried for war crimes. He is responsible for ordering attacks against women and children.
Gen. Mattis was a major general in 2003, I think. So are you saying that all the two stars in OIF were guilty of attacking women and children, or just Gen. Mattis? How about brigadiers, or colonels, or lt. colonels.......
And some supporting data would be nice.
Walt
Morris is mixing up different units in some places. In November 2004, it was 3/1, not 3/5 that took the Jolan, and lost 23 Marines in the fighting. Where there is one inaccuracy, there may be others. Every infantry battalion thinks that their unit is the best. I would take everything in the article with a huge grain of salt.
True MDMIKE, but regardless of this 3/5 has and continues to do a superb job, as well as continually takes a great deal of casualties.
By combat correspondent Nathan LaForte, Sgt USMC, dated 30 Nov 2004:
"After the initial push past the train station, the battalion [3/1], along with 3/5, was tasked with clearing out the Jolan district of the city, which was said to house many of die-hard terrorist factions, noted Heatherman."
Link:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2004/11/mil-041130-usmc02.htm
In response to MDMIKE,
Yes we did clear the Jolan district of Fallujah along with 3/1, and also recleared Fallujah about a dozen or so more times after the other infantry battalions had left. Get YOUR facts straight!
Ouch.
Whether it be the enemy, the terrain, our tactics, the ROE or the misapplication of the ROE - there is a reason for high casualties in a specific location over time.
The reason is not a unit designator nor is it unit tradition. High casualties is not a badge of honor. If the Brits and the predecessor Marine battalion all suffered high casualties in this one area, we need to change what we do there. There are places where the Taliban are supported by the local populace. The local populace is the enemy and they should be treated that way - forget winning them over. If fire comes from a structure - blow it away. Treat this town differently and reexamine what we are doing. I guarantee that there is a pattern to these battles. If you overlay the location of all engagements over the past two years, you will find that they repeatedly occur in the same places. One thing that our military rarely does is learn from the past.
Lastly, I would look for communicating and storage tunnels. If they can develop and expand caves in the mountains, they can dig tunnels down in the flat. Whatever the Brits and our Marines have tried in the past does not work. Insanity is to keep trying the same failing activity over and over hoping for a different result.
Marines are among our very best fighters and they are well-led by intelligent officers - so they are not the problem. It has to be policies and tactics and a failure to think outside the box by somebody above Company level. Always ask the question, "What is different?"
We will win this war because of them and because their enemy, our enemy, is shitting in their boots knowing 3/5 is going to kill them. These same men, who risk their lives for each other and our country, are the same Marines who risk their lives making sure that innocent Afghan civilian’s aren’t harmed.
I sleep well at night because I know what these men are capable of. – Hell – like some of you I served with thousands just like them. Marines refusing to be evacuated for wounds during firefights so as not to let their fellow Marines or the unit down. Marines attempting to escape from field Hospitals in Iraq (missing hands and legs) to return to combat with their fellow Marines. I know this to be true.
For those of you who don’t understand Warrior Ethos, Unit and Combat Cohesion read below. You’ll understand why many of us are 100% against our Government tampering with it in any way (read changing DADT). Our Marines, these Marines, get paid to do one thing and they are doing it extremely well. WIN IN COMBAT. I want my kids to sleep well in 20 years knowing that such men still exist and are capable of the doing the same things to anybody who would harm our country.
If we as a nation destroy that Warrior Ethos we greatly risk ending up like the British etc.. They spent 5 years and accomplished less than 3/5 has accomplished in just over a month.
Semper Fi!
(24)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE