The Best Defense

Which side are you on, Bill Gates?

Congratulations to Google for doing the right thing, and also to for following suit Wednesday and declining to go along with an intrusive new Chinese law that requires turning over personal information. And shame on Microsoft and others for not having as much moral courage. It might be time to consider banishing Microsoft's search engine from your computer, little grasshoppers. And IBM is said to be developing software for China that actually will help track down people. Which side of the Great Firewall are you on, boys?

Here my thoughtful CNAS colleague Richard Fontaine summarizes the state of internet freedom of speech. His concluding warning: "The autocracies have figured out their way forward on this issue. We must do so as well." We might begin by warning American companies that there are consequences for supplying the tools of repression to autocratic regimes.

The Humanaught/flickr

The Best Defense

A word of advice now that the media is hot to trot on Mexico’s drug violence

By Col. Robert Killebrew, U.S. Army (Ret.)
Best Defense
criminal cartels correspondent

The media has picked up on the Mexican cartel wars, and Hillary Clinton's high-level trip down there is an indication of official concern. From where I sit, the danger now is that we'll overreact, in the grand old American tradition, and do more harm than good. The danger of doing so is particularly acute in regard to Mexico, which has a key presidential election coming up in 2012 and whose continued fight against the cartels is by no means assured. Here are some thoughts.

First, Mexico is only one part, though probably the most important one, of a theater of operations that stretches from the Venezuelan-Cuban-Iranian alliance and the Andean Ridge, through Columbia and the FARC, up the cartel-controlled drug routes through Central America, the Caribbean and Mexico, and into the United States, where the cartels control most of the wholesale drug distribution in the US and "subcontract" to the Latino gangs (and others) for retail sales. The same outfits that slit throats in Mexico are also operating in Atlanta.

Second, it's not just about drugs. The Venezuelan alliance is almost a classic geopolitical attempt to deny the US access to Latin America -- probably including Mexico -- and to gain access to our southern border. FARC is not only the world's largest producer of cocaine, but continues to be a murderous terrorist insurgency. The cartels, which are fast becoming a worldwide concern, are not only about drugs, but also about control of territory and other criminal activities -- murder, kidnapping, extortion, counterfeiting, money laundering, among others. This is emphatically not the old, "comfortable" Mafia, and legalizing drugs, even if it were possible, would not make these trans-national criminal organizations go away, particularly when they have the support of narco-states like Venezuela has become. They will just shift to other sources of income.

Third, this issue can be understood through strategic analysis, just like any other strategic problem. But I don't see that happening now. This theater, from the Andean Ridge to Minneapolis and Vancouver, has geography, population and resources, just like any other theater. The two sides have decisive points, a center of gravity apiece, vulnerabilities.  It's past time to build a comprehensive theater strategy -- that's what my current work at CNAS is about. The interesting thing is that at the very basic level, this "war" isn't about drugs, really, but about the things that war has always been about -- that is, control of territory and populations. Politics, in other words. Drugs are just the venue.

So, reporters reading this, remember: It's not just about Mexico, and it is something that Clausewitz, the great Prussian philosopher of war, would understand.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images