Monday, March 8, 2010 - 7:43 AM

Here is an item from last July made more relevant by this movie winning a boatload of Oscars last night, including best picture, best director, and best screenplay:
My wife's idea of a good time last weekend was going to see The Hurt Locker, the new movie about Army EOD techs (explosive ordnance disposal guys-that is, the bomb squadders) in Iraq. So off we went, faster than an EFP in Sadr City.
It's a gripping movie, and I think it gets the emotions right. I also am guessing that it was good on the technical details of EOD work, since the credits listed an expert in that. The film was well-made, notably with persuasive bomb detonations -- not just the usual Hollywood explosions of a cloud of fiery gas, but big rumbling blasts with lots of rocks and dirt and dust hurled your way. Also, they got lots of the American military in Iraq right-the feel of a FOB (forward operating base), even the look of the latrines. And they do the heat of Iraq and its trashy streets right. I think it is the best movie made about the Iraq war so far -- the only one that comes close is The Situation, and that was more about journalists than about soldiers. Interestingly, both movies are set in the summer of 2004, when it was becoming clear that this thing was kind of a fiasco.
But there were enough mistakes on the details to keep me squirming in my seat:
None of these missteps really diminished the movie as entertainment. In a way, they made it easier for me to watch it, because they diminished the intensity by reminding me that this is just a movie. On the other hand, like a clock that strikes 13, they did give me pause, pulling me out of the moment of the movie, again and again. I love it when the small details are right -- it shows the moviemakers cared enough to get it right. It wouldn't have cost much to hire a couple of non-EOD consultants.
Afterward, we went out for Middle Eastern food, which seemed appropriate. The restaurant actually served EFES, the Turkish beer my bureau would drink in Baghdad when Heineken wasn't available. Back then I actually found EFES better because it was fresher -- I suspect the Heineken spends an awful lot of time cooking in the desert en route.
Front: I am an explosive ordnance demolition specialist.
Back: If you see me running, try to keep up.
EOD teams don't travel alone...they need escorts...the rule, in 04/05 was minimum of 3, and EOD would have been the fourth. Also, no cutting of the wires on road-side bombs/IEDs, just send in the robot and blow it.
I think it is tough for military members to get through military movies without commenting on mistakes. Many movies get the uniforms, awards, badges and such wrong. G.I.Joe, where one of the members is a Major in his Mess Dress (sporting a goatee) in a flashback, a couple years later he is a Captain. If by chance you get demoted from MAJ-CPT (by means of a courts marshal), no way are you going to be part of an "eleite squad" like G.I.Joe
Actually, every film you've seen involving soldiers usually has mistakes. It is a crime to impersonate a US Soldier, so they way the studios get around it is including small mistakes on the uniforms.
I remember the stink- raw sewage and unwashed herd animals and shepherds. oh yeah, the smell of cordite after a blast. Too bad no film would ever capture the smell.
however it got most right in terms of capturing a bit of the atmosphere.
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE