Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Share

By Cmdr. Herb Carmen
Best Defense piracy czar

Are some ship masters rolling the dice as they pass through pirate infested waters to save operating costs? Are ship masters intentionally taking the path of least resistance and ignoring Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off the Coast of Somalia? It's something we've been looking at when combing through data of successful pirate attacks. So, too, have the folks at Strategy Page.

In a recent post, Strategy Page points out that about a quarter of the ships passing through these waters are gambling with the safety and well-being of their ships and crews to save time and what can amount to tens of thousands of dollars in operating costs. In doing so, they increase the pirates' chances of successfully hijacking their ship from 1 in 500 to 1 in 200. At a press conference on February 2nd, Rear Admiral Peter Hudson, Commander of EU NAVFOR Somalia, highlighted the fact that many of the ships hijacked were not registered with the Maritime Security Centre (Horn of Africa), were not reporting to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) office in Dubai, and were not following best management practices

Even when vessels are hijacked after ship masters have taken unnecessary risk, insurance companies may still reimburse shippers for ransoms and for costs resulting from the delays of the voyages. Ransoms are often covered under a marine policy's "sue and labor" clause (see line 144 for an example), which covers costs incurred to avoid or mitigate a loss. A sue and labor clause requires the insured to protect damaged property from further loss once a loss has occurred. Often the insurers agree to reimburse the costs, even if costs exceed the policy limits of liability. 

In effect, the sue and labor clause may actually serve to encourage the escalation in payments of ransom. While insurance coverage for ransoms have reportedly increased more than tenfold due to the increased risk, demands for ransom have also risen dramatically in recent months.

Somali pirates are motivated by ransom payments. Perhaps insurers should stipulate that sue and labor reimbursements for ransoms will not be made if best management practices are not followed.

jaxpix/flickr

EXPLORE:AFRICA, PIRATES, SOMALIA
 

BILL KELLER

2:31 PM ET

February 9, 2010

Let's systems engineer this...

with a bit of transparency. Seed funding and investment source for pirates is..... Return on investment source is ransome payer ie the Insurance Co who paid in the last 12 mos are..... Agent for transaction was... Its compensation was.... Banks who handled the transaction are... Funds are now retained in accounts located..... Other investors receiving payments and consideration are.... Their accounts are managed by ..... located in....These funds will be cycled where...

 

RUBBER DUCKY

6:56 PM ET

February 9, 2010

On the bridge...

...of every merchant ship ... in the world ... is this sign: Time Is Money!

 

BILL KELLER

9:06 AM ET

February 11, 2010

Hey Sky-Pirate....

"On Thursday the European Parliament voted to reject a bank data sharing deal with the United States. The parliamentarians resisted appeals from the US to continue a nine-month interim agreement allowing US authorities to access financial transaction date from SWIFT, an international banking transfer system."....DW-World.Com 11-2-2010

It is considered crucial to counter-terrorism.. I think it is crucial to COIN, Anti-piracy and the prevention of human trafficking, narcotics, NBC arms, espionage, currency and capital wars and the jihad.

Any thoughts from the blue suits in the executive dining area formerly known as ward rooms?

Should the dice be snake-eyes?

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More