Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Share

 

Here CWO2/Gunner Keith Marine gives a memorable lecture on patrolling, and nearly runs out of letters in making his points. Read it now and believe it later:

We have to get back our patrolling capabilities.  Ninety percent of everything we do is patrolling but we aren't good at it.  The Iraq experience has done some good things for our Corps but it has diminished our patrolling capabilities.  Our NCOs' experience in Iraq has fostered a sure knowledge that the double column is the preferred formation and moving along roads is acceptable, which are exactly the wrong things to do.  Right now we operate at an acceptable level but with some focused training we can limit our casualties, while killing more of the enemy.  Everyone can spout 5-3-5 rules but few know what it is and even fewer practice it.

A)   Each patrol needs a viable mission that accomplishes a needed task.  Going here because we went over there yesterday is beyond stupid and you are failing as a leader with that reasoning.

B) Go through the orders process in its entirety when able.  At a minimum do route planning and brief an order covering Situation (past 24 or 48 hours and other patrols) Mission (what, where and purpose), Execution (intent, where you expect to make contact or find IEDs and actions when that happens, IA drills for contact, IED strike, Medevac, and cover formation types - where you will satellite/guardian angel, wedge echelon etc).

C) Do a confirmation brief with the platoon commander.

D) Conduct Initial and Final Inspections. 

E) Use an Initial Rally Point inside the wire to conduct your final inspection, do last minute rehearsals or rehearsal of concept drills, final com checks, get in your initial combat formation and be counted out of the wire by the APL - use your APL, most of the Marines now days don't even know what that is.

F) Point men need to be trained along with flanks.  Use a dual point system - one guy looking close for IED threat and one far scanning tree lines.  Walk at a pace that facilitates your mission, not which gets you back to the patrol base quicker.

G) Take security halts and observe your surroundings frequently.  Have one of your patrol elements set up in observation covertly while the other element moves into the village.  Watch the actions the locals do.  Want atmospherics, see if there are runners or people move towards the patrol to greet them.  If something happens, this observation team is already set as a base of fire.

H) Investigate what is happening.  Marines often see locals doing routine tasks, like pumping water or kids playing, when if they investigated vice just continuing to patrol on by, they would see the hole perfectly shaped for an IED amongst the playing children dug by the guy with a pick axe being shielded by the pretty kids playing in the road.  The Taliban are masters at using the obvious to deploy IEDs right under your nose.

I) Use deception.  Send out two patrols at a time in different directions, and then have one circle back.  All too often we rotate patrols in and out.  The Taliban quickly figure out that if the patrol just went west, he has complete freedom of movement to the East.

J) Use Satellites, traveling and bounding over watch and a variety of formations to match the threat. 

K) Do not set patterns.

L) Stay the fuck off of roads and trails.  I believe that every casualty our battalion has taken from IEDs, with the exception of two incidents, has been on a road or trail and it has been at times when the Marines were not required to be on the road or trail as part of a sweep/clearance mission.

M) Use rally points.

N) Use the appropriate formation to be in the most advantageous position to immediately gain the initiative and kill the enemy.  We are very lacking in this area and a lot of our squad leaders just don't get it.  Use TDGs and a variety of training scenarios to get them up to speed and understand a variety of terrain and tactical based scenarios.

O) Crossing Linear Danger areas is a lost art, especially when a patrol will walk three hundred meters along a canal to find a foot bridge to cross it - terrible at setting patterns, just walk through the water but set up near and far side security first and use a variety of techniques so you don't set patterns.

P) Communication Procedures need work.  Rehearse them and have competent Marines on the radio.

Q) Proper dispersion.  Make sure it's enough to mitigate the IED threat but not too much where you are not in a position to get combat power where it needs to be.  If you have to do ten "I'm up they see me, I'm downs" prior to getting your weapon into action, your spent before you go into the assault.  It's all fun and games when someone is shooting at you via pop shots at 300 meters, a completely different story when you have a few machine guns hammering down on you from less than 100 meters.

R) Individual movement and actions such as using available cover and making eye contact with the guy behind you every ten steps or so.

S) Stay in zone a while.  We have become too bogged down with timelines.  More often than not, the Iraq standard of four hour patrols is the constant.  One platoon commander had his guys doing 12 hour patrols.  Initially, when I heard about it, I thought it was stupid.  After visiting the patrol base and going on some of his patrols, I realized he was a genius.  He solved several problems at once.  His Marines automatically set up to observe areas because they had to in order to rest.  They spent a good deal of time speaking with locals, because it's another way to rest.  They moved slowly and deliberately, because the Marines realized iPod time doesn't come until that 12 hours is up.  They covered their entire AO almost daily and 24 hours a day.  Marines had enough time to focus on patrol prep.  There is a lot of ways to accomplish your mission and you have to try a variety.  Change things up and never count anything out.

MANPREET ROMANA/AFP/Getty Images

 

STARBUCK

9:33 AM ET

December 24, 2009

I think a lot of these AAR

I think a lot of these AAR comments harken back to the days before the Iraq War, when troops trained to fight in forests, instead of in urban areas. Those tactics you learned in ROTC are still important!

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

8:55 PM ET

December 26, 2009

JPWREL

The USMC has been pretty quick to adapt, they have there problems like anyone but they have always stuck to the basics and that goes a long way sometimes.
Starbuck, a lot of the tactics we use in the forest are still good for Urban too, bounding overwatches, diamonds, etc..all work in the Urban setting too. We just sometimes forget that.

 

NORWEGIAN SHOOTER

5:07 PM ET

December 28, 2009

This is all fine and dandy

But the proof is in the pudding. How many patrol grunts actually want to follow A through S?

I saw Dahr Jamail talking about his book, The Will to Resist, on CSPAN's BookTV recently, and he said that some patrols in Iraq were phantom, they went out in the middle of nowhere and waited until it was time to return to base. Several guys told him they figured out how to hack into the GPS system and "move" their blip around without actually moving. He said he has now begun to hear of phantom patrols in Afghanistan, too. Check out Jamail's blog:

http://dahrjamailiraq.com/the-will-to-resist

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

10:17 PM ET

December 28, 2009

lol

Please tell me you do not take that crackpot seriously? That guy is and always will be a joke and a lunatic who thinks tinfoil is a fashion accessory. Save the moonbats for other Conspiracy Pages please, the "stories" are a lot like the ones with the tons of fakes who came back talking of war crimes, bravery and "resisting" and then of course is turned out they never did any of the things they did and even worse, were not even in Iraq or Afghanistan. If you take that nut job seriously, might I suggest you talk to people who will take you seriously, they are at 911 truthout.org I am sure they are on the same page ;)

 

NORWEGIAN SHOOTER

12:05 AM ET

December 29, 2009

Point me to some rebuttal

and I'll stop taking him seriously.

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

10:56 AM ET

December 29, 2009

You have to kidding me..

How about prove ANY of his comments about people doing phantom patrols are real? That stuff spreads pretty quick through the ranks, if you think they can keep a secret in the grunts you have never worked with them. As for his "sources", lol, a lot of guys spout crap all the time and then get proven wrong, look at a young man writing for "The New Republic" who was a grunt and writing back about all these things that were going on, the Republic printed them and they turned out to be BS, all made up. Then look at a guy name "MacBeth", lol, irony right? anyway, he claimed he was an Army Ranger who was doing all sorts of terrible things in Iraq, war crimes, body mutilations, etc..guess what? Kid was never a Ranger and never did a bloody thing. Heck, you can go back to the NY Times Magazine and two "victims" of war in that thing who told or woes and being assaulted by there own troops, etc..well guess what again? They were never even in Iraq where they said these things happened. It goes on every single time someone writes a book who is a "journalist", look at the book "No Gun Ri", a Korean War "Expose", again, the two main witnesses in it turned out to be totally full of it, one guy claimed he was a Cross Winner and got a Battlefield Commission, turned out he was a Mechanic who never even fought! lol Dahr Jamail talking about Iraq or the US in an objective manner is like asking the NRA to do an objective study on the Second Amendment, but Jamail will just take full on BS and state it to be true. He is a conspiracy theorist who I have seen on CSPAN actually come with saying crazy things that I just assumed no one would take him seriously. If you really think there is some underground "resistance" going on in the US Military, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn. If you honestly think that guy is a serious journalist, an objective reporter then I cannot even take you seriously, it is like someone using information from books published by Howard Zinn and saying that they have no political angle on it. Just by having that clown Jamail as your ref makes you seem a bit like a troll. lol, sheesh, have you even researched "The Democratic Underground"? Talk about a bunch of paranoid, conspiracy laden crackpots! Go do some more research on Jamail and his supporters at Dem Underground, and if you think they are legit and sane then all I can say is "Birds of a Feather...." ;)

 

NORWEGIAN SHOOTER

1:49 PM ET

December 29, 2009

"Some guys lie" is not a rebuttal

I'll wait for one, though.

As for serious, how about answering my first question: How many patrol grunts actually want to follow A through S?

 

ERIC_STRATTONIII

1:56 PM ET

December 29, 2009

lol, I am not going to rebutt unsubstantiated BS, sorry

I do not give credibility to someone who does not deserve it, sorry, your boy is a whack job conspiracy nut as are most of the people in "The Democratic Underground". You are more than likely far left, fine, let me put in terms you can understand-using those people like they should be taken seriously is like using someone from a far right militia group as a point of information. You get it now?

As for going A-S? Do you mean A-Z? Yeah, I see it all the time, have done it all the time, about to go do it all the time again. I have yet to see a group not do it's job, but I take it YOU have seen this?

 

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008.

Read More