Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Sci fi and national security

Starbuck, who derives his name from fiction, has a good piece in Small Wars Journal along with Adam Elkus about "speculative fiction" (such a tender euphemism) and national security. Their bottom line: I think this is right -- sci fi is really always about the present, which is one of its limiting factors as literature.
I liked their review of the issue, but came away wanting to read more about the related issue of fiction that doesn't appear to be about a given war, or perhaps any war at all, because it is disguised. One obvious example is one they mention, Starship Troopers, which I think is not really about outer space but really about World War II in the Pacific, with the inhuman enemy crawling out of holes in the ground. Even more distant from the war it is about, I think, is Doctor Dolittle, which I think is about World War I. If I recall correctly, it began as letters written home then by Hugh Lofting, who served with the Irish Guards. In a world of trench warfare where men lived like animals, in holes in the ground, Lofting effectively lived in a world of talking animals.
I'd be interested in other examples of books that really are about war, or about a certain war, that don't appear to be so. I think these are in some ways the most profound books about humans hunting and killing each other.
Photo via Flickr user otisarchives2









Some good speculative fiction
The Forever War by Joe Haldeston is directly about war; but in his introductions to various editions he describes it as the direct counter to Starship Troopers. He also says it is his way to describe his experience with the Vietnam War. If Starship Troopers is the way Cold Warriors saw science fiction, than The Forever War is the way Vietnam Veterans did.
As for Speculative Fiction that is not seemingly about war, Lord of the Flies is the best example that comes to mind. It describes power, anarchy, realism and idealism all in the context of children.
As a sci-fi junkie, I find speculative fiction as an incredible tool. While mirroring our modern world, it also can act as case studies for the student of war. It can ask what if questions that fiction cannot. These what ifs help our thinkers prepare for the next war. If we had asked more questions in the nineties, perhaps we would have seen Iraq/Afghanistan coming.
For a book on avoiding war
I would read "Left Hand of Darkness" by Ursula K. LeGuin. Really the only good book I know about FP, and an excellent novel. It is about two nations as they prepare to go to war for the first time.
SM Stirling's Dies the Fire
SM Stirling's Dies the Fire sequence is about a series of small wars in the context of a postapocalyptic world. It's more medievalist warfare than anything, but fascinating from a politcal-historical view.
But a little more recent, the television program Kings (cancelled last year, out now on DVD) posits an alternate-reality adaptation of the life of biblical King David, complete with modern interpretations of tribal warfare. More politic than warring, but it makes some interesting allegories about contemporary Israel-Palestine, and is thirteen episodes of Shakespearean glory. Highly recommended, not only because Ian McShane is incredible.
As Jeff Sharlet writes about
As Jeff Sharlet writes about in "The Family" - The Blob was all about Communism and the Cold War.
Military Sci-fi is big these days
The bookstores are full of military scifi books these days. It's almost all the rage. Gordon R. Dickson or Jerry Pournelle was one of the first authors I knew of besides Robert Heinlein who wrote about war, but Pournelle's best war novels were about mercenaries (Falkenberg's Legion) as was Dickson's (Dorsai!, Tactics of Mistake). Dickson was one of the best writers of his day. Haldeman's truthful work has already been mentioned in a previous comment. David Drake (also mentioned above) practically made the field what it is today with his Hammers Slammers which were based upon his Vietnam tank unit. Drake also writes some good short story fiction about a Roman centurion (Vettius and His Friends (1989)). Then there's David Weber, who's practically surpassed Drake in sheer numbers of books written by now it would appear. I've always had a soft spot for the original Bolo short stories by Keith Laumer. But the best author who wrote about war was Roger Zelazny. His Lord of Light is about one man who changes his world. It's also about war, but then war is about change through violent means.
John
Links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_R._Dickson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Pournelle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Drake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranks_of_Bronze
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Weber
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Laumer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_Light
If war is politics...
The Great Decision: Jefferson, Adams, Marshall, and the Battle for the Supreme Court.
Chief Justice Marshall walked a fine line between a confrontation with President Jefferson that could undermine the Court's power and issuing a ruling that could appear to bow to the President's power and thus undermine the rule of law by making it malleable to the prevailing political winds. He took a very awkward and controversial case (Marbury v. Madison) at a time when the Court was politically very weak and most people could not even agree on the role of the Court. Despite the position of weakness, he delivered a decision that was revolutionary at the time, but that we now take as an obvious given: the Court's power of judicial review. In doing so, he avoided a significant confrontation with the President and also expanded the power of the judicial branch.
It is a good lesson in how someone in a position of weakness can prevail and influence significant change if he focuses upon creatively using the tools available rather than just griping about not having enough money or firepower or whining about the ROE.
Don't want to chime in again but...
A classic on power struggles, and a low level gang war, is the original Godfather by Mario Puzo. Essentially, it describes one of the most irregular of wars possible and how different sides struggled to overpower their enemies with both soft and hard power.
Michael C
the war of the ring and the trenches
The obvious example would be Tolkien, where his experience of the Great War shapes many of the best passages of the Lord of the Rings - perhaps mostly notably the passage through the corpse-haunted, desolate marshlands.
the corpse haunted marshes
The corpse haunted marshes were likely based on the Irish and British peat bogs. The Celts sacrificed people and threw their bodies into the marshes where the corpses were preserved due to the anaerobic environment and the tannins from the decaying plant matter. They are still digging people and artifacts up from the bogs to this day. Tolkien just amplified the number of bodies, but those numbers reflect any of the numbers of casualties from Roman Wars all the way to the Great War.
A few more.
Thanks jbmoore61. A Keith Laumer reference in a Ricks blog is priceless (I wish you could have squeezed in Retief somehow). I don't know if I can answer to the original question, but I would like to add John Steakley's Armor. A lesson when confronting an enemy that values its life much less than you do your own. Another great one that I wouldn't think suffers from the Legacy Futures problem mentioned in the SWJ article is Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. A successful attempt to isolate genius for the sake of military gains.
Dune has to be the ultimate
Dune has to be the ultimate book about our desert wars-of course the Jihadists win in the end.