Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
"The Hurt Locker": recommended, but with reservations

My wife's idea of a good time last weekend was going to see The Hurt Locker, the new movie about Army EOD techs (explosive ordnance disposal guys-that is, the bomb squadders) in Iraq. So off we went, faster than an EFP in Sadr City.
It's a gripping movie, and I think it gets the emotions right. I also am guessing that it was good on the technical details of EOD work, since the credits listed an expert in that. The film was well-made, notably with persuasive bomb detonations -- not just the usual Hollywood explosions of a cloud of fiery gas, but big rumbling blasts with lots of rocks and dirt and dust hurled your way. Also, they got lots of the American military in Iraq right-the feel of a FOB (forward operating base), even the look of the latrines. And they do the heat of Iraq and its trashy streets right. I think it is the best movie made about the Iraq war so far -- the only one that comes close is The Situation, and that was more about journalists than about soldiers. Interestingly, both movies are set in the summer of 2004, when it was becoming clear that this thing was kind of a fiasco.
But there were enough mistakes on the details to keep me squirming in my seat:
- The squad appears to travel around alone in one Humvee. I have never seen that in Iraq. There always is a minimum of two, if only so one can tow the other, or if one gets hit, everyone can pile into the other.
- When they run into a group of British mercenaries in the desert, those guys also are in one vehicle. Not gonna happen, especially way out in the desert. I've been in the desert west of Najaf and watched Strykers get stuck in mud after a sudden burst of rain. You'd want a minimum probably of three vehicles.
- The Brits also would have identified themselves to the American soldiers a lot sooner, especially because they tended to see Americans as trigger-happy back then.
- The mercs tell the Americans they have caught two members of the deck of cards in Najaf. As if senior Baathists are going to hide out in Shiite Central, the home of the Mahdi Army. This would be like known KKK leaders seeking refuge in Harlem.
- Also, in the same scene, two EOD techs suddenly turn into an expert sniper team, getting a headshot with a .50 caliber Barrett at least 750 meters. This whole Brits-in-the-desert episode should have been dropped, which also would have improved the length of the movie, which is a half hour too long. (Several other technical details wrong with the weaponry in this scene are detailed by Internet Movie Data Base.)
- A colonel is way impressed with the bomb squad, which I am sure happens, but I doubt he'd be all slobbery. That's just the Army culture that I've seen in Iraq. At any rate, any brigade commander also is going to be aware of the thousands of hairy situations his own guys have encountered, so isn't likely to gush. Overall, the portrayal of officers in this film was kind of weird -- they were mainly absent, but when present, they were laughable. Yes, I saw a few genuine dud officers in Iraq, but overall this is not the Army I know, or the relationship between NCOs and officers that I see.
- A combat trauma counselor is a big wanker. I am sure that there are some, but this guy seemed over the top. Not like the ones I've seen.
None of these missteps really diminished the movie as entertainment. In a way, they made it easier for me to watch it, because they diminished the intensity by reminding me that this is just a movie. On the other hand, like a clock that strikes 13, they did give me pause, pulling me out of the moment of the movie, again and again. I love it when the small details are right -- it shows the moviemakers cared enough to get it right. It wouldn't have cost much to hire a couple of non-EOD consultants.
Afterward, we went out for Middle Eastern food, which seemed appropriate. The restaurant actually served EFES, the Turkish beer my bureau would drink in Baghdad when Heineken wasn't available. Back then I actually found EFS better because it was fresher -- I suspect the Heineken spends an awful lot of time cooking in the desert en route.
AHMAD AL-RUBAYE/AFP/Getty Images
- Middle East | Culture | Iraq | Media | Military









It is not entertainment
I will not spend money on movies making a profit off of people dying for this country. It is not entertainment. I do not play paintball either- I know what it is about. But I do fence, which is the most violent activity I have ever taken part in on a regular basis. If it were not for that little button on the end of the epee- it would be murder. And I hunt small game, which is killing and involves cutting open little body cavities and spilling guts. Playing with swords and zapping bunnies is not war. If such drama is not really happening you are suspending disbelief to stay interested and entertained. That is acceptable for uberman mythic storytelling and events a generation gone by so they are not forgotten- but for recent tragedy it is offensive. If such movies are seen as a way of honoring our soldiers or informing the public then we really need better ways of honoring our soldiers and being informed.
Le epee est plus forte que la
Le epee est plus forte que la plum en Irak, malheureusment.
And those who
live by the sword....
Actually I think art has a role
Actually I think art has a major role in helping us live with what we see and learn in war. That was one of the things that drove the ancient Greek tragedies.
I'm not saying that 'Hurt Locker' is Sophocles. But I do think it is art.
Best,
Tom
"Tactics are only a very
"Tactics are only a very small part of warfare." - Xenophon
When once a man had taken his place in the phalanx of his city, Socrates reminded his audience in the last speech of his life, "he must stay put there and face the danger without any regard for death or anything else rather than disgrace."
All war movies
(in)flame the fans of the next war. At least that's the barracks thesis of the author of 'Jarhead.' Show 'Battle of Algiers' and we'll pick a side and try to figure a better tactic, without considering the failed strategy. With due respect to the differences, pics of wipeouts and un-rideable waves do quicken the pulse and sell the garments in the surf movies and fan mags.
The 70's vintage BBC "UXB" series is worth revisiting, in a seemingly relentless era of mine warfare.
An enduring Afghan film image for me was a news segment documenting controlled demolition of corroded artillery rounds. It took a major effort to hold the villagers at a safe distance. An oklahoma landrush ensued as children to elders scrambled and dug by hand for hot shards, salvage for the next war. Perhaps the false limbs parachuting past the refugee camp in Kandahar was realism, rather than the surrealism I took it to be. Remember when this war started, and we were (reportedly) using B-52's to scatter combat rations over the old killing fields? Unfreaking believable, but that's the way it was told on TV, an object of national pride.
Documentaries aren't perfect, but sometimes they get the wardrobe and location details right.
Wouldn't Vince D'Onofrio (L&O/CI) cast well as veteran war correspondent Ricks, in a Fiasco/Gamble franchise?
It happens to us all.
I used to be annoyed by a historian friend who counted the buttons on the uniforms during war films. But now I rant and rave over the circa-1970s haircuts in the otherwise wonderful "Go Tell the Spartans." (A movie that did get the "look" of the time remarkably well was "Gardens of Stone," which had that great bar scene, but otherwise sort of fell apart.) I'm looking forward to "Hurt Locker," but will enjoy just a little less now.
So Ricks, how about a (war) movie list?
Class too dumb to quit.....
Friedman in today's NYT. We are back to analysis equal to Giap, i.e., whatever is being 'successfully' achieved that resulted from adaptation in hard knocks is irrelevant. Modern twist - 'but please don't stop doing it'.
going AWOL
Tom, I felt the same way about The Hurt Locker: a good effort but with ill-advised scenes that served to pull me out of the experience. What about the part when James removes most of his uniform and goes AWOL off of Camp Victory, dashing about alone on that vigilante mission in Baghdad? To me that was right up there with the whole driving-the-Humvee-alone-in-the-desert-and-suddenly-turning-into-a-crack-sniper-team bit...
Then again . . .
. . . Mansoor relates the tale of two soldiers going off on their own and getting married to Iraqi women . . .
Yup
Things were pretty loosey-goosey back in '03, and even into '04. I remember when my car couldn't make it out the Airport Road (AKA Route Irish), because of a sudden checkpoint, one day in the summer of '03, I just walked down the road back into Baghdad. Couldn't do that a year or two later.
Did the movie happen to mention...
May as well get everyone use to it... The mayhem, the gory glory of American body bags complete with toe-tags...
Pink mist where humans used to be...
Broken heart-ed parents.
Sobbing emotionally shattered spouses and friends.
Did they show all that too?
Didn't think so...
Gonna be there (and Afghanistan, and Somalia, and Baluchistan, and the rest of the region) a long long time... at least until the psycho-emotional attrition on our troops of the standard regional tactic of killing one invader a day like clockwork (Just like "the British Experience" in the last century, that's the way it's going THIS month) begins to take it's toll on morale.
(Hint... we're already there... How's the soldier suicide rate doing Ricks?)
Did the movie also happen to mention that our allegedly IED impervious million dollar-a-copy MRAPS aren't?
Didn't think so.
It's amazing what a well-machined copper freeze plug and some shaped-charge fertilizer/fuel oil in a steel pipe can do.
Just like the amazing ability of the Vietnamese walking on sandals made from the tires of stolen US jeeps to kill 58,000 American children using WWII vintage weapons, Punji Sticks and tiger traps while being 'carpet bombed' by B-52s and the high tech weapons of THOSE days,
the Iraqis, Afghanis, Baluchis, and the rest of the citizens of "Themistan" have just begun their obligatory slaughter of the invaders.
That's US Ricks...
I KNOW the second largest part of the CIA's budget after the Directorate of Operations is MOVIE-MAKING (and I DON'T mean training films) but do tell, how much of our tax dollars is the Pentagon spending propagandizing our children that they have some perverse 'moral' obligation to serve in a military that markets these worthless wars as a drone operator remotely killing MOSTLY CIVILIANS while sucking down their breakfast coffee thousands of miles away (Silicon Systems, Grass Valley California f'rinstance) or some other ethically and spiritually barren supporting role in our last big war movie called:
"The End Of The American Empire: The Final Days"
Of course you and your CNAS friends don't look at it that way, but you're all being paid for that POV.
History Lesson
A Short (Because no one's managed to stay longer than that) History Of Military Attempts To Dominate Afghanistan, Baluchistan, And Environs
EOD uses 50-cal sniper rifles
Just a minor nit: EOD teams routinely use the 50-cal sniper rifle to "disrupt" explosives from a safe distance. So it's far from implausible that an EOD team would be skilled in the rifle's use.
Read "Making the Corps" during my off-duty time in Baghdad -- thanks for the few hours of escape (gotta love it when reading about Boot Camp is escapism).