The Best Defense

D magazine jokes about shooting Pelosi

Those funsters at D, a Dallas city magazine, saw fit to run this rib-tickling commentary, relating to welcoming home George W. Bush:

From my own experience visiting the troops in the Middle East, I can tell you this, though: despite how the conflict has been portrayed by our glorious media, if you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Osama bin Laden, there's a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and bin Laden would be strangled to death."

I guess this was just too funny to wait for the November issue.

(This has been picked up everywhere, but a tip of the Best Defense Dick Raddatz-era Red Sox cap tip to Crittenden, who notified me first, and who also has a huge, if somewhat Anglophiliac, reading list on his site.)

glennharper/flickr

The Best Defense

Why knowing something is important

Antiwar.com rolls in touting Col. Gian Gentile as an unrecognized savior and slams CNAS for being having several people (Nagl, Kilcullen, Exum, me) being focussed on counterinsurgency. Note to bloggers: This is what happens when someone writes about an area about which they know absolutely freaking nothing. This is one reason, for example, I try to avoid writing about, among other things, basketball, golf, cats, oboes, scuba diving, physics, Maxwell's demon, electric cars, farming, abstract sculpture, the works of Anthony Powell, South America, or Buddhism.

What's Antiwar's point here? Bad on CNAS, I guess, for being interested in issues like protecting the population. I mean, does Antiwar.com understand what it is advocating here? I've seen how the U.S. military operated in Iraq in 2003-06, and I really think we don't want to go back to that approach. (I actually was embedded with Col. Gentile's unit in February 2006, and remember asking him why his unit operated on a big FOB instead of being based out among the people.)

Or, as a colleague of mine says,

So let's get this straight: Antiwar.com promotes Gian Gentile, who argues that we should conduct COIN in the form of 19th-century British punitive raids, as the Army's shining light. Ergo, Antiwar.com is in favor of more Predator drone strikes and "direct action" counterterrorism?

Good question, Antiwar.com.

Anyway, there is a good discussion of all this over on Abu Mook's blog.