Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - 2:37 PM

I think this observation made by Defense Secretary Robert Gates at the Army War College in early April captures the essence of strategy, much more than anything about tying together ways, means and goals.
By the time a decision gets to the president, there are no good options. If there was a good option, somebody at a lower level would have made the decision and taken credit for it. By the time a decision gets to the president or secretary of Defense, more often than not, you've having to choose the least bad option."
Of the six defense secretaries I've covered, the two most effective were William Perry and Robert Gates. Both are smart, articulate, reserved, and wise. The difference between the two, I think, is that Gates seems to me to have a killer instinct, which probably helps him herd the services along. Just ask the Air Force these days.
U.S. Army
aren't really that popular with the troops, I'm told. Perhaps Sec'ty Gates is demo'ing a less bad option.
Maybe it's the contrast with Gates' suit, but the digi cammies look like pajammies on those guys.
I sincerely think Gates has been and continues to be a great Secretary of Defense. The contrast with the previous placeholder doesn't hurt him, either.
There's a typo bugging me in the last bit of the quote-'you're'. Please delete this comment if it gets fixed.
It is the culture of the career game....
It is a game where to win means only to not lose - as in tennis and yes, warfare.
My key takeaway from a great strategic management class was that strategy means giving something up (and of course the hard part is choosing what). If you think you can have it all you must not understand the situation. I think Gates gets this and that is why he is making real 'strategic' choices on acquisition and systems development.
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE