Remember yesterday I mentioned David
Wood as a good defense reporter? He has a terrific column today about what
is going wrong in Afghanistan. I'll summarize it here, but only if you promise
to click on this link
and read the whole thing.
Wood begins with a good strong "lede" that manages to
combine action and policy:
When a warning crackled over the
radio of a suspected ambush ahead, Lt. Col. Rob Campbell swore softly and
ordered his three armored trucks to a halt. What happened next illustrates why
the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan is failing, why commanders here are asking
for more manpower -- and why they are pleading for more time.
Then his main character strides into the picture, along with a succinct
statement of the problem:
Leaping out with his M-4 carbine,
Campbell, a tall cavalry officer with sandy hair and freckles, strode through
the empty, sun-baked fields flanking the road while his men fanned out,
checking the ground for IEDs, sweeping the fields for snipers. The Afghan
police assigned to patrol this stretch of road? Nowhere in sight.
Campbell comes off as a good, thoughtful officer doing well,
but conscious that time is running out. Anyway, read the whole thing -- one of the
best things I've read on Afghanistan in awhile.
Meanwhile, NATO
aircraft hit some hijacked fuel tankers in northern Afghanistan, killing a
bunch of people. Some of them were insurgents, some of them children and other
civilians trying to get the fuel the Taliban was distributing from the trucks
for free. The total is somewhere between 50 and 90, it appears. My question:
Does this air strike pass the Petraeus
test, which I saw him apply in Mosul back in 2003-2004: Before taking any action,
consider whether it will create more opponents than it stops. Anyway, this
makes me wonder if NATO forces got snookered into the attack.
Paula Bronstein/Getty Images
COMMENTS (2)
Read More
